Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors writing for high-impact journals like Physical Review Letters (PRL). It addresses the strict 'deductible budget' model where figures, equations, references, and text all count against a single limit. Provides systematic steps to triage content—such as moving derivations to Supplemental Material, compressing figures, and tightening prose—to ensure the core scientific claims remain clear and within publication guidelines.

This guide teaches the 'trust-minimum principle' for writing methods sections in short scientific letters (like PRL). It instructs authors on how to rigorously partition their work, keeping only the essential, trust-bearing details (setup, key controls, uncertainties) in the body, while relegating full derivations and extensive apparatus details to the Supplemental Material (SM). This ensures brevity without sacrificing scientific credibility.

A comprehensive guide for structuring high-impact scientific manuscripts for Physical Review Letters (PRL). Learn how to sharpen your central claim and articulate the broad significance of your findings, transforming a detailed lab report into a concise, single-argument narrative. Focuses on the one-claim discipline, optimizing the opening paragraph, and crafting a compelling abstract.

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of determining if a scientific finding meets the 'Importance' and 'Broad Interest' criteria required for top-tier physics journals, such as Physical Review Letters (PRL). It diagnoses venue fit, helping authors frame their work to maximize visibility and impact, without altering the core scientific result. Useful for optimizing manuscript submissions and developing a clear narrative for non-specialist audiences.

This guide provides authors with best practices for structuring scientific papers, specifically focusing on the division of content between the main body (The Letter) and the Supplemental Material (SM). It emphasizes the 'stand-alone' rule, ensuring the core argument remains fully understandable without consulting the SM, while effectively organizing detailed derivations, extended datasets, and secondary controls in the appendix.

A comprehensive guide for polishing scientific manuscripts intended for high-impact journals like Physical Review Letters (PRL). It teaches how to achieve maximum concision, ensure precise notation, and structure the argument to be highly readable for a broad, non-specialist audience, strictly adhering to APS house style standards.

This guide teaches authors how to structure the Introduction and Discussion sections for top-tier journals with extreme word and reference constraints. It moves beyond traditional literature reviews, focusing on a 'surgical' approach: quickly establishing the research gap, clearly stating the unique contribution, and demonstrating the broad relevance of the findings to the wider field.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R) reviews in top psychological journals. It teaches how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, maintain scientific credibility, address demands for robustness and transparency, and manage strict word count limits without compromising scientific rigor.

A guide for structuring the theoretical framework and hypotheses section of a psychological science manuscript. It emphasizes academic rigor, research transparency, and the necessity of clearly separating confirmatory (preregistered) predictions from purely exploratory findings. Learn how to state a clear mechanism, derive directional hypotheses, and avoid 'HARKing' to strengthen your scientific argument.

This skill guide teaches how to structure and tighten academic manuscripts specifically for high-impact journals like Psychological Science. It focuses on adapting content to strict constraints, including the APA 7th edition style, a structured 150-word abstract, and precise word budgets for the Introduction and Discussion sections. It helps writers polish existing arguments rather than generating new claims.

This skill guides the structure and prose for drafting high-level integrative reviews, particularly for publications like the Psychological Bulletin. It ensures the manuscript moves beyond descriptive annotation to become a rigorous, evaluative synthesis. Users must comply with APA 7th edition style and specific reporting standards (MARS for meta-analyses, PRISMA for systematic reviews, and JARS for quantitative work). It provides detailed guidance on structuring the abstract (≤ 250 words), the method section, results, and discussion to meet expert reviewer expectations.

A specialized methodology for theoretically placing a new model within an existing academic conversation. It instructs the user to build a 'rival map' by identifying diagnostic phenomena, contrasting them with established rival theories, and explicitly stating where the new theory excels, surpasses, or subsumes existing claims. This approach moves beyond simple literature review to active theoretical confrontation.