Skill UI

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final necessary checks before submitting a manuscript to AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA system. It ensures strict compliance with single-blind review rules, JEL code requirements, formatting standards, data availability statements, and disclosure policies, significantly improving the likelihood of a successful submission.

A specialized guide for responding to a 'conditional accept' decision from AER: Insights. It teaches authors how to draft a concise, decisive revision plan within a tight 8-week window. Focuses on strict adherence to formatting rules, maintaining the original scope, and finalizing the replication package.

A comprehensive final pre-submission checklist for American Economic Review: Insights. This guide ensures your manuscript meets strict journal requirements, including word count limitations (main text and exhibits), abstract length, author metadata, and adherence to the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Use this before submitting to avoid auto-return gates.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist designed for authors aiming to submit original research papers to high-level academic journals, such as Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). This guide covers essential academic components, including proper abstract structuring, keyword adherence, specialized referencing formats (GB/T 7714), blind review compliance, ethical data handling, and formatting standards. It minimizes the risk of rejection during the initial editorial screening process.

A comprehensive final checklist guiding authors through the submission process for Agricultural Systems journals (AgSy) via Editorial Manager. It ensures compliance with detailed guidelines, covering abstract word limits, required declarations (CRediT, COI, Funding, AI), graphical abstract preparation, and data/code deposit. Use this guide as the last step before final submission to avoid common desk-rejection errors.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the complex process of revising manuscripts after receiving multiple, demanding expert reports (R&R). It outlines strategic approaches for structuring the response letter, handling conflicting reviewer demands, and rigorously protecting the core historical argument while maintaining academic anonymity.

This skill acts as the primary orchestrator for any American Historical Review (AHR) manuscript. It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, determining the next necessary step based on the project stage. From developing a significant historical question and gathering primary sources to structuring the argument, refining prose, and managing citations, it ensures the focus remains on deep historiographical evidence and interpretation.

This skill guides authors in evaluating whether their chemical engineering manuscript meets the high standards of the AIChE Journal. It helps authors re-frame application-specific work into generalizable principles, focusing on fundamental scientific advances, rigorous modeling, and comprehensive experimental validation, ensuring the contribution transcends a single process.

This guide details the critical steps required after conference acceptance to prepare a paper for the final, public 'camera-ready' submission (e.g., AISTATS, PMLR). It covers transforming an anonymous manuscript into the final two-column format, restoring author metadata, handling public artifacts (code, data), resolving formatting issues, and confirming all presentation and copyright obligations.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a detailed audit checklist for preparing submissions for major AI conferences like AISTATS. It covers critical pre-submission requirements, including maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to strict page limits, managing OpenReview details, and ensuring reproducibility. Use this checklist before the abstract or full-paper deadline to mitigate desk-reject risks.

A comprehensive project management guide for the entire academic lifecycle of submitting a paper to a top-tier conference like AISTATS. It maps all crucial milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence freezing to abstract submission, review discussion, and final camera-ready publication—providing backward-planning heuristics and risk assessment to ensure timely and high-quality submissions.

This guide provides detailed instructions for structuring the introduction of academic manuscripts, particularly for high-stakes, double-blind review journals. It teaches authors how to frame their research contribution by engaging a live, recognized academic debate, precisely locating the marginal intellectual gap, and strictly maintaining anonymity through third-person self-citation.