Skill UI

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

This comprehensive guide details the critical steps for converting an accepted EuroSys paper into the final ACM proceedings format. It covers complex template changes, mandatory metadata completion (eRights, ORCID), artifact linking, and ensuring absolute coherence between the final PDF and the ACM Digital Library record. Essential reading for authors preparing for final submission compliance.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

A guide for structuring academic manuscripts that argue their contribution within a broader, comparative, and theory-driven European sociological debate. It helps authors transition from writing a national case study to establishing a portable, contestable claim that advances cross-national theory, focusing on identifying theoretical disagreements and the specific 'move' the research makes.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process at the European Sociological Review (ESR). It helps authors anticipate reviewer critiques on comparative design, quantitative modeling, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the manuscript is structured for success before submission.

A comprehensive final checklist designed for academic researchers preparing manuscripts for scholarly journal submission (e.g., double-blind review processes). This guide ensures adherence to complex publisher standards, covering mandatory elements such as complete manuscript anonymization, drafting the Data Availability Statement (DAS), assembling replication packages for statistical work, and meeting strict formatting and word count requirements. Use this before final upload to avoid avoidable desk returns.

This router guides authors through the complex submission process for rigorous quantitative sociology journals (ESR). It diagnoses the manuscript's stage (Idea, Article, Comment, Data Brief) and methodological shape (comparative, longitudinal, multilevel), ensuring the user is routed to the correct specialized skill set, rather than following a linear process. It is an orchestrator for academic research development.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final review process before submitting manuscripts to Field Crops Research (FCR). It ensures adherence to strict journal requirements, covering scope confirmation, formatting rules (abstract word count, highlights structure), comprehensive reporting (weather vs. phenology, statistics), and mandatory declarations (data availability, AI use). Use this guide to minimize rejection risk and streamline the submission process.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle by first enforcing a critical 'scope gate' (checking for field-based, multi-environment relevance). It then intelligently routes the user based on the project stage, article type (e.g., Original Research, Review, Opinion), and necessary steps, ensuring the manuscript is scientifically viable before any content drafting begins.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

A comprehensive preflight guide for submitting academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for Financial Management (FMA) via the FMA/ScholarOne platform. It details critical steps, including fee payment, genre-specific formatting rules (anonymization, style guides), originality declarations, and the correct two-stage submission workflow to ensure manuscripts are properly processed and maximize acceptance chances.