Skill UI

This router guides the author through the complex, multi-stage process of submitting a top-tier economics manuscript to the Quarterly Journal of Economics (QJE). It diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it's conceptual framing, causal identification, robustness checks, or writing style—and directs the user to the appropriate specialized skill stage (e.g., literature positioning, identifying, rebuttal). It does not replace specialized skills but ensures optimal workflow sequencing.

This comprehensive preflight guide ensures authors meet all technical and procedural requirements before submitting to academic journals, specifically detailing the steps for the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It covers mandatory steps such as confirming submission fees, adhering to strict formatting rules (abstract length, citation style), preparing data archives (Option C), and navigating the journal's specific workflow (ScienceDirect/Editorial Manager). Following this checklist minimizes rejection risks due to formatting or procedural errors.

Guides authors through the rigorous, end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a paper to the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It acts as an orchestration checklist, covering critical stages from initial scope definition and quantitative modeling to data archiving, manuscript formatting, fee payment, and handling revisions. It ensures authors maintain methodological rigor and code-first discipline throughout the entire academic publishing process.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, point-by-point rebuttal letter in response to major/minor research policy revisions. It teaches how to synthesize conflicting referee comments into a coherent plan, defend core innovation claims with evidence, and manage the handling editor's expectations, ensuring the original contribution is protected throughout the revision process.

Provides a comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to Research Policy (RP) via the Elsevier online system. It guides authors through critical steps, including double-blind anonymization, confirming article scope (anchoring in innovation studies), selecting the correct article type (Full Article vs. Research Note), and ensuring all required declarations (data/code, funding) are included before final submission.

This router guides authors through the entire lifecycle of a manuscript targeting specialized academic journals like Research Policy (RP). It determines the optimal next step—whether it's refining the theory, developing methods, performing data analysis, structuring arguments, or responding to reviewer critiques (rebuttal). It ensures the paper maintains a strong focus on innovation studies and policy implications.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to specialized journals. It guides users through verifying complex requirements, including formatting rules (double-spacing, font size), style compliance, data availability policies, and submission fee procedures, ensuring the paper is submission-ready and meets journal standards.

Guides authors through the rigorous process of revising and responding to referee reports (R&R) for top-tier academic journals. It details how to structure the response letter, triage reviewer comments (concede, clarify, push back, decline), and ensures the revised manuscript precedes the letter. Essential for maintaining academic credibility during the publishing cycle.

This workflow acts as a comprehensive router for academic researchers, guiding the entire manuscript lifecycle from initial topic selection and literature positioning through empirical identification, theoretical modeling, writing refinement, and final submission/rebuttal. It ensures the work adheres to the rigorous standards of top journals like The Review of Economic Studies (REStud).

This skill guides researchers through the rigorous process of refining a preliminary accounting idea into a sharp, contribution-driven research question suitable for top academic journals like Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users identify the core accounting construct, define the mechanism (friction/channel), and ensure the study's focus is on accounting theory, rather than merely using accounting data in a general finance context.

This router guides the entire workflow for developing a high-quality academic manuscript targeting the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST). It helps users determine the next necessary step—be it theory development, data analysis, refining contributions, or preparing for submission and rebuttal—ensuring methodological rigor and structural completeness throughout the writing process.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of scholarly reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and critical integrative syntheses. It maps out the necessary steps—from question scoping and protocol registration (PRISMA) through systematic searching, framework building, data coding, and final submission/revision—ensuring methodological rigor for high-impact academic journals.