Skills Soft Skills AEJ Micro Manuscript Workflow Router

AEJ Micro Manuscript Workflow Router

v20260724
aejmic-workflow
This skill acts as a workflow router, guiding researchers through the entire manuscript lifecycle for submissions to American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It does not write the paper, but diagnoses the current bottleneck—whether it's topic selection, model refinement, empirical testing, or rebuttal strategy—and specifies which specialized aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, ensuring the paper aligns with the specific requirements of AEJ: Micro. Triggered when users are unsure what step to take next, or when revising based on reviewer comments.
Get Skill
321 downloads
Overview

AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?"
  • A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
  • Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter
  • An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode

Routing table

Current symptom Next skill
Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied) aejmic-topic-selection
Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversold aejmic-literature-positioning
The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck aejmic-theory-model
Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the work aejmic-identification
Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missing aejmic-robustness
Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messy aejmic-tables-figures
Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not land aejmic-writing-style
Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, README aejmic-replication-package
Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject odds aejmic-referee-strategy
Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight aejmic-submission
Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy aejmic-rebuttal

Default order

  1. aejmic-topic-selection — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory question
  2. aejmic-literature-positioning — stake the result against the closest theorem
  3. aejmic-theory-modelthe central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategy
  4. aejmic-identification — what makes the result tight / what identifies parameters
  5. aejmic-robustness — extensions, edge cases, applied robustness
  6. aejmic-tables-figures — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tables
  7. aejmic-writing-style — make the result land (abstract + intro last)
  8. aejmic-replication-package — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)
  9. aejmic-referee-strategy — pre-empt the objections theory referees raise
  10. aejmic-submission — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)
  11. aejmic-rebuttal — after the R&R

aejmic-writing-style is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.

Anti-patterns

  • Polishing prose or exhibits while the model or main proof is still movingaejmic-theory-model must settle first
  • Treating AEJ: Micro like JET/GEB (specialist, maximal generality) or AEJ: Applied (empirical) — wrong fit gate
  • Deferring the proof appendix and any numerical/experimental code until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication
  • Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors

Routing by paper archetype

AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

Archetype Likely first bottleneck Enter at
pure theory (mechanism/game/decision) equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generality aejmic-theory-model
theory with structural estimation parameter identification + counterfactual validity aejmic-identificationaejmic-theory-model
theory-grounded experiment design maps to the model's prediction; pre-registration aejmic-topic-selectionaejmic-identification
IO theory / applied micro-theory the mechanism's robustness to modeling choices aejmic-theory-modelaejmic-robustness

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:          -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:                -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees:          -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code:         -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro:                 -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples:           -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases:       -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id:         -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled:       -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy:       -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else:                                -> aejmic-topic-selection
Info
Category Soft Skills
Name aejmic-workflow
Version v20260724
Size 6.82KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language