Skills Data Science AJOG Submission Guide for OB/GYN Studies

AJOG Submission Guide for OB/GYN Studies

v20260724
american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology
A comprehensive guide for authors submitting clinical or translational research to the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG). It provides detailed criteria on scope fit, required methodologies (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), ethical considerations (especially pregnancy-research ethics), and house style requirements, ensuring the study meets the journal's high clinical importance standard.
Get Skill
189 downloads
Overview

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology)

Journal positioning

The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG, "the gray journal") is a flagship women's-health journal publishing clinical and translational research across the full breadth of obstetrics and gynecology — maternal-fetal medicine and pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology and infertility, gynecologic surgery, and gynecologic oncology. Its defining expectation is a clinically important advance for the care of pregnant patients or for gynecologic health, grounded in rigorous design and appropriate maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome reporting — not an underpowered single-center series, a descriptive case report, or a study with overstated causal claims. Because much of the work involves pregnancy, AJOG places particular weight on pregnancy-research ethics and clear reporting of maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live AJOG author instructions.

When to trigger

  • The author names AJOG or "the gray journal" for an obstetrics or gynecology clinical study and wants a fit/framing check.
  • An OB/GYN study must be re-framed around a maternal/fetal or gynecologic outcome question with appropriate design.
  • The author is choosing between AJOG, a subspecialty OB/GYN journal, and general medicine.
  • The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and pregnancy-research ethics expectations.

Scope & topic fit

  • Maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics: pregnancy complications, preterm birth, preeclampsia, fetal growth, and labor/delivery management.
  • Reproductive endocrinology and infertility: ovulation, assisted reproduction, and reproductive-outcome studies.
  • Gynecologic surgery: benign and minimally invasive surgery with operative and patient-centered outcomes.
  • Gynecologic oncology: cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and related cancers with clinical endpoints.
  • Maternal and women's-health screening, diagnostics, and prevention with meaningful outcomes.
  • Placental, fetal, and reproductive translational science with clear clinical relevance.

Method & evidence bar

  • Studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered maternal, fetal/neonatal, or gynecologic outcomes; surrogate endpoints need justification.
  • The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, STARD for diagnostic accuracy.
  • Trials require prospective registration and the registration number; protocol/SAP are expected.
  • Maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes must be defined and reported clearly, including gestational age and relevant safety outcomes for mother and offspring.
  • Observational claims must address confounding (including by indication), bias, and missing data; causal language must match the design.
  • Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures; clinical significance must be argued.

Structure & house style

  • AJOG/Elsevier format with a structured abstract and an AJOG-at-a-Glance / condensation and "why this matters" statement; re-check current article types (Original Research, etc.) and limits on the live guide.
  • The introduction frames the OB/GYN clinical question; the discussion states the practice implication for maternal/fetal or gynecologic care plainly.
  • A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD flow diagram is expected for the relevant design.
  • Tables/figures follow the journal's statistical-reporting standards; a supplement carries the protocol/SAP, full statistical methods, and additional analyses.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and AJOG/Elsevier anchors, then cite the current AJOG page you checked.
  • Search the live site for "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology instructions for authors" and follow the current version.
  • Re-check article types, abstract and condensation/at-a-Glance format, and word/figure/reference limits.
  • Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD), data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
  • Re-check IRB/ethics and consent with attention to pregnancy-research ethics (maternal consent, fetal/neonatal considerations, vulnerable-population protections), ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • The study answers a clinically important obstetric or gynecologic question with a clear practice implication.
  • Maternal, fetal/neonatal, or gynecologic outcomes are prespecified, powered, and clearly defined.
  • The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/STARD) is completed and attached.
  • Trials are prospectively registered with the number in the manuscript; protocol/SAP provided.
  • Pregnancy-research ethics (maternal consent, fetal/neonatal and vulnerable-population protections) are documented.
  • IRB/consent, ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Underpowered single-center series or case report with limited generalizability and no clear practice change.
  • Observational analyses with inadequate confounding control or overstated causal claims about pregnancy outcomes.
  • Incomplete or poorly defined maternal/fetal/neonatal outcome reporting.
  • Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
  • Inadequate pregnancy-research ethics documentation, or narrow subspecialty interest better served elsewhere.

Re-routing decision

  • Gynecologic-cancer clinical-oncology endpoint dominant → jama-oncology / annals-of-oncology.
  • Gynecologic surgical technique/outcome as the primary contribution → jama-surgery.
  • Reproductive endocrinology centered on hormone mechanism → journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism.
  • Gestational diabetes centered on diabetes mechanism/outcomes → diabetologia.
  • Broad practice-changing obstetric/gynecologic trial → general medicine (jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (the gray journal)
[Specialty tags] <maternal-fetal / reproductive / gyn surgery / gyn oncology>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / diagnostic-STARD>
[Method/evidence] <power, maternal/fetal outcome definition, confounding control, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / pregnancy-research ethics / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
Info
Category Data Science
Name american-journal-of-obstetrics-and-gynecology
Version v20260724
Size 7.61KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language