Skills Productivity APSR Manuscript Submission Preflight Guide

APSR Manuscript Submission Preflight Guide

v20260724
apsr-submission
A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to the American Political Science Review (APSR). This guide emphasizes the critical steps for double-anonymous review, including stripping file metadata, properly anonymizing text to prevent author identification, and adhering to strict formatting rules (APSA Style, word counts, and abstract limits). Use this before uploading to Editorial Manager.
Get Skill
60 downloads
Overview

Submission Preflight (apsr-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on Editorial Manager. APSR is double-anonymous, so the single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
  • Unsure which files/metadata Editorial Manager expects
  • Confirming the chosen track's caps are met and the manuscript is properly anonymized

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

  • Owner / publisher: American Political Science Association (APSA) / Cambridge University Press.
  • Portal: Editorial Manager (editorialmanager.com/apsr).
  • Review model: double-anonymous — anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page.
  • Tracks: Regular Article (< 11,000 words), Research Note (< 7,000 words — see 待核实 on the exact cap), Replications and Reappraisals, Syntheses, Registered Reports.
  • Abstract: ≤ 150 words.
  • Word count: put it on the front page; counts include tables, figures, and printed footnotes, exclude the reference list and online appendices.
  • Style: APSA Style Manual for Political Science (author-date).
  • ORCID: required for the corresponding author (submissions after 1 Jan 2019).
  • Fee: no submission fee and no APSA-membership requirement (verified 2026-06-22). Hybrid Cambridge journal; post-acceptance Gold OA APC is optional — Cambridge 2026 standard £2,610 / US $3,655 plus tax (re-verify the current rate before submission).

Anonymization deep-audit (the failure that actually happens)

Under double-anonymous review the manuscript file itself must not identify you. Beyond deleting the byline, sweep these known leak points:

  • Self-citations. Keep the citations (omitting them distorts the literature) but voice them in the third person: "as we demonstrated (Author 2021)""as Author (2021) demonstrates." Avoid a wall of "Anonymized (2021)" placeholders — a cluster of redactions identifies you almost as reliably as a name.
  • Acknowledgments, grant numbers, IRB protocol numbers — move to the separate title page; an IRB number is traceable to an institution.
  • File metadata — author fields, tracked-changes and comment names, PDF creator strings. Strip in the source and re-check the compiled PDF.
  • Links — replication or preregistration URLs on a named account; use anonymized views until acceptance.
  • Prose tells — "our earlier fieldwork," a dataset only one team possesses, thanks to a named RA. Do one full read asking only: could a reviewer in my subfield guess?

Computing the word count

Count the body plus tables, figures, and printed footnotes (captions and cell text included); exclude the reference list and online appendix; print the number on the front page. Leave a few hundred words of headroom — revisions grow papers, and an R&R should not burst the track's cap.

Submission-day sequence

  1. Freeze the manuscript; run the anonymization sweep above on the frozen file.
  2. Compile two files: anonymized manuscript + separate title page.
  3. Log in to Editorial Manager under the corresponding author's ORCID-linked account; choose the track deliberately (caps and reviewer expectations differ by track).
  4. Enter metadata — title, ≤150-word abstract, keywords — matching the manuscript exactly.
  5. Proof what the system builds for reviewer view before approving: metadata stripped, no title-page bleed-through, exhibits render.

Preflight checklist

Track & length

  • Track chosen and its word cap met (Article < 11,000 / Note < 7,000)
  • Word count on the front page (includes tables/figures/footnotes; excludes refs + appendix)
  • Abstract ≤ 150 words, states question + approach + finding

Anonymity (double-anonymous)

  • No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
  • No obvious self-references ("as we showed in…"); self-citations neutralized
  • Identifying file metadata stripped (document properties, comments)
  • Anonymized pre-analysis plan / OSF link if preregistration is referenced
  • Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file

Format & metadata

  • APSA Style Manual formatting; consistent author-date citations
  • Corresponding-author ORCID ready
  • Figures/tables self-contained, accessible (see apsr-tables-figures)

Compliance & files

  • Ethics / IRB / human-subjects compliance per APSA principles
  • Original work; preprint status checked against Cambridge preprint policy
  • Reproducibility package staged for the APSR Dataverse at conditional acceptance (see apsr-transparency-and-data-policy)

Anti-patterns

  • Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks anonymity)
  • Abstract over 150 words; no word count on the front page
  • Sending a long paper to the Research Note track
  • Choosing Registered Reports after results exist
  • Budgeting for a submission fee that is not charged (none as of 2026-06-22; only optional post-acceptance Gold OA APC)

Output format

【Track】Article / Note / Replication / Synthesis / Registered Report (caps met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤150)
【Word count on front page】incl. tables/figures/footnotes? [Y/N]
【APSA style + ORCID】[Y/N]
【Repro package】staged for APSR Dataverse? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → apsr-rebuttal on R&R

Supplementary resources

Info
Category Productivity
Name apsr-submission
Version v20260724
Size 6.15KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language