Skills Soft Skills Manuscript Submission Preflight Checker

Manuscript Submission Preflight Checker

v20260724
epsl-submission
This tool guides researchers through the final pre-submission checklist for academic journals like EPSL. It verifies critical mechanical elements—such as word count adherence, data availability statements with DOIs, declarations of competing interests, and file format compliance—before uploading to the journal's editorial manager. It ensures the manuscript passes all technical gates.
Get Skill
477 downloads
Overview

Submission Preflight (epsl-submission)

The last pass before uploading to Editorial Manager, EPSL's Elsevier submission and peer-review system. The avoidable failures at this stage are mechanical: a main text over the letters cap, a missing data-availability statement, undeposited data, or incomplete declarations — each can bounce the manuscript before any science is read. Exact requirements (word cap, highlights, file formats) are volatile; re-check them on the official Guide for Authors the week you submit.

Templates in this skill: templates/checklist.md and templates/manuscript_template.md.

When to trigger

  • Final pass before upload to Editorial Manager
  • Unsure which files, statements, and metadata EPSL expects
  • Verifying the letters-format constraints are actually met

Process facts (re-check volatile items on the official page)

  • Publisher / system: Elsevier; submission through Editorial Manager (the journal's entry link is on the ScienceDirect journal page).
  • Format: a Letter — main text (introduction through conclusions) capped near 6,500 words (re-check); concise titles; companion papers discouraged.
  • Article types: Letters; invited Frontiers Papers (do not self-select without invitation); Comments/Replies; Errata/Corrigenda; Special-Issue papers.
  • Data: Elsevier research-data policy — a data-availability statement, discipline-repository deposition (EarthChem, PANGAEA, IRIS/EarthScope, MagIC, NASA PDS, Zenodo), linked at submission.
  • Declarations: competing interests, authorship/CRediT contributions, funding, and generative-AI use per Elsevier policy; ORCID for the corresponding author.
  • References: Elsevier author–date house style (re-check the current instructions); DOIs included.
  • Supplement: uploaded with the manuscript and reviewed with it.

Preflight checklist

Format & length

  • Main text within the letters cap (count introduction → conclusions; re-check the figure)
  • Title concise and process-forward; abstract self-contained with the headline number
  • Highlights prepared if the current guide requires them (re-check)

Files

  • Manuscript source file per the guide; figures at required resolution/format, vector line art
  • Supplementary material assembled and internally referenced (Fig. S1, Table S1…)
  • Full data tables deposited; DOIs/accessions resolve

Statements & metadata

  • Data-availability statement with repository DOIs
  • Competing-interest, authorship-contribution, funding, and AI-use declarations written
  • Corresponding-author ORCID linked; all coauthors approved this version
  • Suggested (and any opposed) reviewers entered; cover letter final (see epsl-cover-letter)

Bounce-at-upload gates

Gate Pass condition Fixed in
Letters length main text within cap epsl-writing-style
Data statement present, identifiers resolve epsl-reporting-and-reproducibility
Declarations COI / CRediT / funding / AI complete this skill
Figure files format, resolution, colormaps compliant epsl-figures-and-tables
Article type Letter (Frontiers only if invited) epsl-workflow

Worked micro-example (illustrative — the night-before pass on the slab-fluid Letter)

  • Length: main text 6,140 words introduction→conclusions — under the cap with margin for revision growth. Pass.
  • Data: EarthChem DOI for the boron dataset resolves; the tomography model archived with a Zenodo DOI; both cited in the statement. Pass.
  • Declarations: CRediT roles drafted per author; no competing interests; AI-use statement covers the language-editing tool per Elsevier policy.
  • The near-miss: the supplement still cited "Figure S6," deleted two drafts ago — a broken internal reference reviewers reliably notice. Caught by a final cross-reference sweep.

Anti-patterns

  • Counting only the abstract-to-references span and discovering the cap violation after format checks
  • "Data available on request" in the statement field
  • Declarations copied from another journal's template with the wrong policy names
  • Self-selecting the Frontiers type to look invited
  • Uploading supplement and manuscript versions that disagree on a number

Output format

【Length】main-text words vs cap (re-check) [count / cap]
【Files】manuscript + figures + supplement compliant? [Y/N]
【Data statement】DOIs resolve? [Y/N]
【Declarations】COI / CRediT / funding / AI / ORCID? [Y/N]
【Reviewers + cover letter】entered and final? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → epsl-revision-and-rebuttal

Supplementary resources

Info
Category Soft Skills
Name epsl-submission
Version v20260724
Size 7.01KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language