Skills Data Science ICASSP Conference Paper Submission Checklist

ICASSP Conference Paper Submission Checklist

v20260724
icassp-submission
A comprehensive audit guide for submitting papers to ICASSP conferences. This checklist covers crucial requirements such as the mandatory 4+1 page format, single-blind review rules (including author list inclusion), CMS portal submission protocols, EDICS metadata selection, and compliance with ethical standards. Use this guide before the deadline to avoid desk rejects.
Get Skill
136 downloads
Overview

ICASSP Submission

Run this audit against the live ICASSP paper kit on the current-year CMS portal (cmsworkshops.com/ICASSP<year>/papers.php), not against memory. ICASSP reissues its kit each cycle, and because the whole review pipeline assumes a uniform IEEE two-column object, the format is checked mechanically at upload. The next major gate as of 2026-07-09 is the ICASSP 2027 full-paper deadline, reported ~16 September 2026 — verify on the live 2027 call.

The format contract: 4 + 1

An ICASSP regular paper is 4 pages of technical content — text, figures, and references all count — with an optional 5th page that may hold only references, funding acknowledgements, and the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement. Consequences to internalize:

  • There is no reviewed appendix or supplement that decides acceptance. Whatever a reviewer must see to accept the paper lives on the four content pages.
  • References compete with content on pages 1-4 unless they spill to page 5; plan the reference budget early.
  • Use the official IEEE two-column template from the paper kit with fonts, margins, and column measure untouched, and confirm the PDF passes IEEE PDF eXpress before the portal will accept it.

Single-blind: the inverted anonymity rule

ICASSP review is single-blind. Unlike OpenReview or ISCA venues, you must include the author list and affiliations in the submitted PDF; reviewers see who you are, you do not see them. The failure mode here is the opposite of an identity leak:

  • A missing or wrong author block is the defect to catch, not a self-citation.
  • Write self-citations in normal first person ("in our earlier work [4]"); no anonymization gymnastics are needed.
  • Acknowledgements and funding are allowed and belong on page 5, not hidden.

Portal and metadata (CMS, not CMT)

  • Submission is through Conference Management Services (CMS) at cmsworkshops.com, not Microsoft CMT and not OpenReview — a genuine ICASSP fingerprint.
  • Choose the EDICS subject category that routes the paper to the correct technical committee; the routing decision comes from icassp-topic-selection, not from whoever uploads.
  • The CMS abstract must match the PDF abstract; it is what area organizers read.
  • No single author may appear on more than 9 papers in a cycle — check co-author load early.
  • Answer the dual-submission attestation honestly: the same work may not be under review at another conference or journal simultaneously.

Desk-reject and triage table

Trigger Severity at ICASSP Repair window
Fifth page carrying content beyond references/acks/ethics Desk reject None after deadline
Template tampering caught by PDF eXpress Desk reject None
Missing author list (single-blind requires it) Non-compliant submission Only before deadline
Missing Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement Compliance flag Only before deadline
Author on more than 9 papers Enforced cap Withdraw one before deadline
Dual submission to another venue Integrity violation None

Final 72 hours, in order

  1. Rebuild the PDF from a clean clone; confirm the paper-kit template version is current and PDF eXpress passes.
  2. Confirm the author block, affiliations, and page-5 acknowledgements/ethics statement are present and correct — the single-blind checklist.
  3. Verify every figure is legible at print resolution and no float pushes past four pages.
  4. Set EDICS and the CMS abstract to match the PDF; declare all co-authors and their conflicts.
  5. Upload, download what CMS stored, and read that file end to end.

Track choice before you submit

  • Standard track — 4+1 pages, TPC review, proceedings in IEEE Xplore.
  • OJSP-ICASSP — 8+1 pages, reviewed by the Open Journal of Signal Processing board, open-access publication, presented but not in the proceedings (earlier pre-registration deadline).
  • SPS-journal presentation — present a recently accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed, not in proceedings.

Confirm each track's separate deadline in the current call; see icassp-workflow.

Output format

[Submission verdict] ready / fixable / not ready
[Format] 4+1 compliance, template integrity, PDF eXpress result
[Single-blind] author list present, affiliations, page-5 acks/ethics
[Metadata] EDICS, abstract match, author list, dual-submission answer, 9-paper cap
[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-presentation / grand-challenge
[Blockers] <ordered list>

Currency note

The 4+1 format, single-blind policy, CMS portal, and 9-paper cap were checked 2026-07-09 against ICASSP 2026 (Barcelona) renderings (see ../../resources/official-source-map.md). Every value is cycle-specific; the ICASSP 2027 Toronto cycle publishes its own kit and calendar — re-open it.

Info
Category Data Science
Name icassp-submission
Version v20260724
Size 5.16KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language