ICASSP Workflow

Use this as the project-management skill for an ICASSP submission. Replace every date with the current official timetable and work backward from the paper deadline. ICASSP is an IEEE Signal Processing Society conference, rebuilt by a new local committee each year; it has no standing editor-in-chief, and the cost model is registration, with the proceedings paper published in IEEE Xplore.

The annual clock (2026-cycle shape, verify each year)

• September — full-paper deadline on the CMS portal (ICASSP 2026: 17 Sep 2025; ICASSP 2027 reported ~16 Sep 2026, the next major gate as of 2026-07-09).
• Autumn/early winter — single-blind technical-committee review.
• December — short rebuttal/author-response window (2026 cycle: reported to ~22 Dec 2025), if the cycle runs one.
• Late winter — notification; accepted-paper revision window (2026: to ~28 Jan 2026).
• Spring — IEEE Xplore camera-ready (PDF eXpress + IEEE copyright form), registration.
• May — the conference; in-person oral or poster presentation (ICASSP 2026 Barcelona, 4-8 May; ICASSP 2027 Toronto, 16-21 May).

Milestones

• Venue fit — confirm the contribution is genuinely signal-processing and ICASSP-routed, not a generic-ML paper or a speech paper better suited to Interspeech (see icassp-topic-selection).
• Evidence lock — freeze the mechanism, the task-matched metric, the standard baseline, the condition sweep, and seeds.
• Paper deadline — upload the 4+1 PDF with the author list (single-blind), EDICS, and the ethical-standards statement through CMS.
• Rebuttal — if it runs, reply early and move the one decision-critical objection.
• Notification and camera-ready — integrate reviewer fixes within the accepted claim, pass PDF eXpress, sign the copyright form, register.
• Conference — present in person; ship the public artifact.

Backward plan from the September deadline

These offsets are planning heuristics — anchor each to the current official timetable, never to a past cycle.

Track decision (decide before the deadline)

Standard 4+1        -> TPC review, IEEE Xplore proceedings, in-person present
OJSP-ICASSP 8+1     -> OJSP editorial review, open-access journal, present (not in proceedings),
                       earlier pre-registration deadline
SPS-journal present -> already-accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed, not in proceedings
Grand Challenge     -> short paper via the challenge, present, may appear in proceedings

Failure modes by stage

• Choosing the corpus or metric late forces a scramble that a subfield reviewer sees through.
• Leaving format conversion to the final week surfaces four-page overflow too late; IEEE two-column is tighter than a working draft.
• Skipping the mock review forfeits the one chance to hear "that is the wrong metric for this task" from a friend rather than a reviewer.
• Missing a track's separate earlier deadline (OJSP pre-registration, grand challenge) forecloses the best-fit path.

Coordination notes

• Assign one named owner for the CMS submission (format, EDICS, metadata) and another for the reproducibility package; shared ownership is how both slip.
• Archive the exact submitted PDF, since a rebuttal must quote it precisely.

Output format

[Current stage] idea / experiments / writing / submission / rebuttal / accepted / camera-ready
[Next official deadline] <date and source, or unknown>
[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-present / grand-challenge
[Critical path] <three tasks that determine readiness>
[Owner map] <task -> person or role>

Currency note

The 2026-cycle dates and the ICASSP 2027 September gate were checked 2026-07-09 (see ../../resources/official-source-map.md); the 2027 exact deadline is 待核实 until its CFP is readable directly. Nothing carries from Barcelona to Toronto automatically — re-open the current call.