Submission Preflight (jmf-submission)

The last check before pressing submit. JMF is double-blind, so the single most common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized manuscript. New JMF manuscripts have used Wiley Research Exchange since the June 25, 2025 NCFR transition; live-check the current portal link and file requirements before upload.

When to trigger

• "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
• Unsure which files/metadata the portal expects
• Confirming the chosen format's limits are met and the manuscript is properly anonymized

Process facts (live-check operational items on the official page)

• Owner / publisher: NCFR (National Council on Family Relations) / Wiley.
• Portal: Wiley Research Exchange for new submissions (after 25 Jun 2025); ScholarOne Manuscript Central for earlier submissions — confirm the current link on NCFR's "Submit" page.
• Review model: double-blind anonymous — anonymize the manuscript; supply author details separately as the system requires.
• Formats: Article (≤ ~35 pages) and Brief Report (≤ ~25 pages), including abstract, text, tables, and figures.
• Abstract: structured, ~200–225 words — Objective / Background / Method / Results / Conclusion / Implications — included in the main document.
• Style: modified APA; Microsoft Word, 12-point font; bias-free language per APA.
• Data: data availability statement per Wiley's data-sharing policy; replication-level detail and shared/restricted data access path.
• ORCID / fees: ORCID is common in Wiley workflows; live-check the current portal for required identifiers, submission charges, and open-access APC options.

Preflight checklist

Format & length

• Format chosen and its page limit met (Article ≤ ~35 / Brief Report ≤ ~25, incl. tables/figures)
• Structured abstract ~200–225 words with all labeled sections present
• Modified-APA formatting; Microsoft Word, 12-pt font (confirm current spec)

Anonymity (double-blind)

• No author names, affiliations, contact information, or acknowledgements in the manuscript
• Self-citations to work under review/forthcoming neutralized
• Identifying file metadata stripped (document properties, comments)
• No identifiable information about participating couples, children, or families

Data, ethics & files

• Data availability statement drafted (shared / restricted + access path)
• Replication materials / code staged (OSF/ICPSR/Dataverse) where data terms allow
• Ethics / IRB / human-subjects protections documented
• Corresponding-author ORCID ready if required; fee/OA status checked in the live portal

Desk-handling patterns at JMF (avoid before upload)

These are anonymization, scope, and format gates that an editor can apply before peer review; clearing them is what converts a desk-screen into a sent-for-review decision.

Worked micro-example (illustrative)

A longitudinal dyadic paper on marital quality and health is ready to upload. Preflight catches, in order: (1) the Acknowledgements still thank a named grant and lab — removed and held for the title page; (2) "as we showed in Smith (2023)" self-identifies the author — neutralized to "prior work has shown"; (3) a couple's verbatim quote names a town small enough to identify the family — generalized; (4) the abstract is 240 words and unlabeled — cut to 215 and split into the six structured sections; (5) the manuscript is 38 pages, over the ~35 Article limit — two full robustness tables moved to supplementary materials, bringing it to 34. Word counts and page counts here are illustrative. Only after these does the data availability statement and the live portal link get confirmed.

Referee/editor-facing pitfalls and fixes

• "Could identify the authors." Anonymization is not just the byline — funding, IRB-protocol numbers, named datasets you uniquely collected, and PDF metadata all leak identity in a double-blind venue.
• "Could identify participating families." Generalize town names, employers, and rare family configurations so no couple or child is re-identifiable.
• "Format limit exceeded." The page cap typically includes tables and figures; thin the exhibits or move detail to supplements rather than shrinking margins or font.

Calibration anchors (hedged where uncertain)

• Owner/publisher (NCFR/Wiley), the double-blind model, the structured abstract, and the Article/Brief-Report split are stable identity features of JMF; live-check the portal URL, file requirements, fee/APC information, and any policy wording before upload.
• Treat every numeric limit in this skill as a default to verify, not a guarantee.

Anti-patterns

• Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgements, or file metadata (breaks anonymity)
• An unstructured abstract or one outside the word range
• Sending a full study to the Brief Report format (or vice versa) without meeting its limits
• Submitting to the old portal after migration (or assuming a fee that has changed)
• Bias-laden or imprecise language about family forms or identities

Output format

【Format】Article / Brief Report (page limit met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata + no identifiable families? [Y/N]
【Structured abstract】~200-225 words, all sections? [Y/N]
【Modified APA + bias-free + Word/12pt】[Y/N]
【Data availability statement + repro materials】[Y/N]
【Portal】Wiley Research Exchange (current link confirmed?) [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → jmf-rebuttal on R&R

Supplementary resources

• ../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers, anonymization, repro tooling
• ../../resources/official-source-map.md — official JMF/NCFR/Wiley URLs behind every fact in this pack