Submit through the Wiley Research Exchange (ReX) portal at wiley.atyponrex.com/journal/JOOM. There is no submission fee; JOM is hybrid open access (subscription publication is free; an APC applies only if you choose CC-BY — amount 待核实, confirm on the Wiley JOM page).
JOM's cover letter has unusual, mandatory requirements:
A completed submission checklist must accompany the manuscript — "Submissions will not be considered in the absence of this checklist." Complete every item before uploading (see templates/checklist.md).
Review is double-anonymous with an asymmetric rule: author identities are shared with the Editors-in-Chief and Department Editors but not with reviewers or Associate Editors. Practically: strip author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, and self-identifying citations/file metadata from the manuscript, while supplying full identities in the portal's author fields.
Double-spaced, single-column, 12-point, one-inch margins, numbered pages, no running headers/footers; ~40-page guidance (over-long manuscripts are returned for streamlining); APA style; Wiley Data Availability Statement required for research/synthesis articles; ORCID linked.
A JOM submission is returned without review if mandatory elements are missing. The map below ties each requirement to its failure mode; verify exact current requirements (APC amount, length guidance, similarity policy) against the Wiley/JOM author pages, as several values change.
| Package element | Requirement | Return/desk-reject if absent |
|---|---|---|
| Department routing | Name 2 Departments, one preferred | Misrouting or no routing stated |
| Reviewer recommendations | ≥3 AEs and ≥3 ERB reviewers, conflict-free | Cover letter incomplete |
| Disclosures | AI use, prior dissertation/conference, prior data use, prior reject-and-resubmit | Undisclosed prior use surfaces later |
| Submission checklist | Completed and attached | "Not considered in the absence of this checklist" |
| Anonymization | Names, affiliations, metadata, self-cites stripped | Identity leak to AEs/reviewers |
| Similarity | Single-source <1%, overall <15% or justified | Unexplained high similarity |
A team submitting an archival operations study marks Inter-organizational Operations preferred and Operational Systems alternate, names three conflict-free AEs and three ERB reviewers, and discloses a prior conference version plus prior, non-overlapping use of the dataset (illustrative). They report an iThenticate score of 12% with no single source above 1%, so no justification paragraph is needed. They confirm double-spaced 12-point with no headers, attach the completed checklist, and include the Wiley Data Availability Statement. That package clears the portal's mechanical gate and routes cleanly to the Department Editor.
【Portal】Wiley ReX (JOOM)
【Departments】preferred ...; alternate ...
【Reviewer recs】AEs: ...; ERB: ...
【Disclosures】AI/dissertation/prior-data/reject-resubmit ...
【Anonymization】pass/issues
【Checklist attached】yes/no
【Next step】jom-review-process
See templates/cover_letter_template.md and templates/checklist.md.