Skills Data Science Clinical Ethics and Research Integrity Checklist

Clinical Ethics and Research Integrity Checklist

v20260724
nejm-ethics
A comprehensive checklist for confirming clinical ethics and research integrity required for academic submissions, adhering to standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki and ICMJE guidelines. It guides authors on securing IRB approval, obtaining informed consent, managing conflicts of interest, defining authorship roles, and ensuring data transparency through mandatory data-sharing statements. Essential for preparing manuscripts for high-impact medical journals.
Get Skill
445 downloads
Overview

Clinical Ethics & Integrity (nejm-ethics)

When to trigger

  • The Methods do not state IRB/ethics approval or how informed consent was obtained.
  • ICMJE disclosure forms are not collected for every author.
  • There is no data-sharing statement (required by ICMJE for clinical trials).
  • Authorship, contributions, or the role of the funder are unstated or unclear.

Human-subjects ethics

  • IRB / ethics committee approval — named committee(s) and that approval was obtained before enrollment.
  • Informed consent — obtained from participants (or legal surrogates); describe any waiver and its basis.
  • Declaration of Helsinki — state the trial was conducted in accordance with it (and GCP for trials).
  • Special populations — additional protections for children, incapacitated adults, emergency-consent settings.

ICMJE conflict-of-interest disclosures

  • Every author completes the ICMJE disclosure form; financial and non-financial conflicts are reported.
  • The manuscript carries a disclosure / competing-interests statement; "ICMJE disclosure forms are available with the full text" is the typical NEJM phrasing.
  • Disclose relationships even if the author judges them irrelevant — the editor decides relevance.

Authorship and contributions (ICMJE criteria)

ICMJE authorship requires all four: (1) substantial contribution to design or data; (2) drafting or critical revision; (3) final approval; (4) accountability for the work. Everyone meeting them is listed; everyone listed meets them.

  • Contributors who do not meet all four go in Acknowledgments (with permission).
  • Disclose medical writers and their funding source.
  • State the corresponding author's attestation of data integrity and analysis.

Role of the funding source

  • A role-of-the-funding-source statement is required: did the funder design the study, collect/analyze/interpret data, write the manuscript, or decide to submit?
  • For industry-sponsored trials, state who had access to the data and who vouches for completeness and fidelity to the protocol.

Data-sharing statement (ICMJE)

ICMJE requires a data-sharing statement for clinical trials. Specify:

  • What individual-participant data (and supporting documents: protocol, SAP, analytic code) will be shared.
  • When (e.g., after publication, with an end date or "indefinitely").
  • To whom and for what (e.g., researchers with a methodologically sound proposal).
  • By what mechanism (repository, request to a committee) and under what conditions (data-use agreement).
  • "No data will be shared" is a permissible statement but must be explicit and justified.

Patient privacy and other integrity items

  • De-identify all data and images; remove PHI; obtain consent for any potentially identifying material (e.g., clinical photographs).
  • Trial protocol publication — NEJM publishes the protocol and SAP with trials; ensure they are submission-ready (see nejm-study-design).
  • Report plagiarism/originality status: the work is original and not under consideration elsewhere.
  • Note any preprint posting and prior presentation.

Statement placement map (draft each as a named block)

Draft each statement as a block with a fixed home, then verify all blocks survived formatting:

  • Methods — study conduct: named IRB/ethics committee(s), consent method (or waiver basis), Helsinki + GCP conformance.
  • Methods — oversight (trials): who designed the trial, analyzed the data, wrote the first draft, and who vouches for data completeness and fidelity to the protocol; the protocol and SAP accompany the article.
  • End matter: disclosure statement ("ICMJE disclosure forms are available with the full text"), funding acknowledgment, data-sharing statement.

Worked micro-example — data-sharing statement (before → after)

  • Before (fails ICMJE): "Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request."
  • After: "De-identified individual-participant data, with the protocol and statistical analysis plan, will be shared beginning 12 months after publication with researchers whose methodologically sound proposal is approved by the trial's data-access committee, under a signed data-use agreement."

The before answers none of the four ICMJE questions — what, when, to whom, by what mechanism.

Output format

【IRB/ethics approval + consent】 stated? Helsinki/GCP cited? yes/no
【Placement】 conduct/oversight/end-matter blocks all present after formatting? yes/no
【ICMJE disclosures】 all authors' forms collected + statement drafted? yes/no
【Authorship】 all 4 ICMJE criteria met by each author? contributors acknowledged? yes/no
【Role of funding source】 statement present + data-access/vouching for trials? yes/no
【Data-sharing statement】 what/when/to-whom/how specified (ICMJE)? yes/no
【Privacy】 de-identified, PHI removed, consent for identifying material? yes/no
【Next】 nejm-abstract

Anti-patterns

  • Do not submit a trial without IRB approval and a consent description in the Methods.
  • Do not omit the data-sharing statement — ICMJE requires it for clinical trials.
  • Do not list honorary authors or omit qualifying contributors.
  • Do not hide the funder's role, or who had full data access in a sponsored trial.
  • Do not include identifiable patient information without explicit consent.
Info
Category Data Science
Name nejm-ethics
Version v20260724
Size 5.7KB
Updated At 2026-07-28
Language