Submission Preflight (popdevr-submission)
The last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne Manuscripts. PDR is double-anonymized, so the
most common avoidable failure is a manuscript that still identifies its authors. PDR uses Free Format
for the first round — strict formatting is deferred to revision — but the science, the anonymization, and
the statements must be in order. Verify volatile specifics on the Wiley author page before relying on them.
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects
- Confirming the manuscript is anonymized and the right article type/length is chosen
Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
-
Owner / publisher: Population Council (owner) / Wiley (publisher); quarterly; founded 1975.
-
Portal: ScholarOne Manuscripts (confirm the current submission link). 待核实.
-
Review model: double-anonymized — remove all identifying information about all co-authors; do
not name yourself as author in the text or metadata.
-
Free Format (first round): simplified submission — references may be in any consistent style,
with strict formatting (APA-style house style) applied at revision. Confirm current Free Format scope. 待核实.
-
Article types: Research Article (typically ~8,000–10,000 words), Notes & Commentary (short),
Data & Perspectives, Archives, Book Reviews (usually invited).
-
Front matter: abstract + keywords (confirm the current abstract word limit on the author page). 待核实.
-
Fees: no author fees — no submission fee and no article-processing charge (APC) under the
standard model (open-access/Online Open options may carry a separate Wiley APC if chosen). Consistent
with the Wiley author guidelines as of 2026-06-22; re-verify on the author page before submission. 待核实.
-
ORCID + statements: ORCID for the submitting author; data availability statement; funding,
conflict-of-interest, and ethics declarations (see
popdevr-transparency-and-data).
Preflight checklist
Type & length
Anonymity (double-anonymized)
Format & metadata (Free Format first round)
Compliance & files
Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-anonymized review)
- Sending a long paper to the Notes & Commentary track, or padding a Note to Article length
- Assuming a Wiley APC applies — under the standard model PDR has no author fees (verify)
- Skipping the data availability statement because "it's only needed at acceptance"
- Over-formatting the first round when Free Format is accepted (waste of effort; just keep it consistent)
Compliance pre-screen: what the desk checks first (by article type)
PDR's editors/committee screen for fit and rigor before review; getting the basics right keeps the focus
on the science. Map your type to its norms (confirm current numbers on the Wiley author page):
| Item |
Research Article |
Notes & Commentary |
Data & Perspectives |
| Length (norm) |
~8,000–10,000 words |
short |
focused on the data/indicator |
| Abstract / keywords |
required (limit 待核实) |
required |
required |
| Double-anonymized |
required |
required |
required |
| Data availability statement |
required |
required |
required (central) |
| ORCID (submitting author) |
required |
required |
required |
Referee/editor pushback at the desk and the submission-side fix
-
"Self-identifying references compromise the double-anonymization." -> Neutralize self-citations
("prior work [Author] showed" not "as we showed"), strip document-property metadata, split off a
non-anonymous title page.
-
"This Note exceeds the short-form norm." -> Trim to a focused Note or move it to the Research Article
track; do not submit an over-length Note.
-
"The data availability statement is missing." -> Stage the statement and FAIR-repository deposit now
(see
popdevr-transparency-and-data).
-
"Was this submitted through the right portal?" -> Use ScholarOne Manuscripts; confirm the current link
on the Wiley author page.
Output format
【Type】Article / Note / Data & Perspectives (length norm met? Y/N)
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + file metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract / keywords】present + within limit (待核实)? [Y/N]
【Free Format】references consistent (APA at revision)? [Y/N]
【Data statement + ORCID】drafted + repo staged + ORCID? [Y/N]
【Fees】confirmed no submission fee / APC under standard model? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision -> popdevr-rebuttal on R&R
Supplementary resources
