The orchestrator for a PDR submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. PDR is the Population Council's journal at the intersection of demography AND development — the router's first job is to confirm the paper connects population dynamics (fertility, mortality, migration, ageing, structure) to social, economic, or environmental change and public policy, with the big-picture reach PDR is known for, not a narrow estimate that merely uses population data.
popdevr-rebuttal)| Situation | Type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original study or substantial synthetic/conceptual essay | Research Article (typically ~8,000–10,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| Short, focused argument or response on a current population question | Notes & Commentary (short) | popdevr-literature-positioning + popdevr-writing-style |
| A new dataset, indicator, or interpretation of population statistics | Data & Perspectives | popdevr-data-analysis + popdevr-transparency-and-data |
| Archival population document or official-agency text with framing | Archives | popdevr-writing-style |
| Evaluative review of a population/development book | Book Review (usually invited) | popdevr-writing-style |
Length is a norm, not a hard portal cap. Confirm current limits and types on the Wiley author page (see 待核实). PDR uses Free Format submission for the first round.
Idea / fit (pop ↔ development)? -> popdevr-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? -> popdevr-literature-positioning
What's the argument/mechanism? -> popdevr-theory-building
Is the design/method sound? -> popdevr-research-design
Are the analyses sound? -> popdevr-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? -> popdevr-tables-figures
Does it read for a broad audience? -> popdevr-writing-style
Data statement & sharing plan? -> popdevr-transparency-and-data
How will it be judged? -> popdevr-review-process
Ready to submit (ScholarOne)? -> popdevr-submission
Got an R&R / decision? -> popdevr-rebuttal
topic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> transparency-and-data -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal
Iterate: PDR papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis as the population-and-development argument sharpens; a synthetic essay loops literature-positioning ↔ theory-building ↔ writing-style instead, since its contribution is the framework, not a new estimate.
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the population process, the development/policy linkage, the data and time scale, the selection/measurement issue, and the uncertainty; then test whether the manuscript addresses PDR's broad audience — demographers, economists, environmental and policy scholars — who inspect both the population evidence and its development meaning.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch
the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for
volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / data / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Research Article / Notes & Commentary / Data & Perspectives / Archives / Book Review
【Route to】popdevr-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — population + development data sources and software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md — official PDR URLs behind every fact in this pack