Submission Preflight for RED (red-submission)
When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before uploading to RED
- Confirming the fee, the submission route, and the required front matter
- Unsure whether to anonymize (you should not — RED is single-anonymized)
RED submission facts (verified; re-confirm on official pages)
-
Fee gates review. The current Elsevier Guide lists a USD 195 standard submission fee; USD
100 if all coauthors are full-time students at submission; no fee for papers being resubmitted a
second or later time. First invited resubmissions pay a new fee. The review process does not begin
until the fee is received.
-
Route. Submit via the journal's ScienceDirect page ("Submit your article"); the workflow runs
through Elsevier Editorial Manager.
-
Do NOT anonymize. RED uses single-anonymized review — author identity is visible to reviewers.
-
Abstract ≤250 words, stand-alone, no internal references.
-
Keywords: 1 to 6.
-
References: author-year (Harvard) style.
-
Generative AI: declare any use at submission.
-
SSRN preprint: RED offers free SSRN preprint posting during submission; the manuscript is made
public once it passes the initial desk screen — opt in if you want early visibility.
-
Replication and data readiness: stage the RED data/code archive now and prepare the Elsevier Option C
data statement/repository metadata (see
red-replication-and-data-policy). Flag any proprietary-data
exemption to the Coordinating Editor at submission.
Preflight checklist
Anti-patterns
- Anonymizing the manuscript for a single-anonymized journal
- Assuming review starts before the fee is paid
- Paying a fee on a second-round resubmission that is actually exempt
Last-mile desk-risk scan
Run this scan after the mechanical preflight — it catches the substantive issues the fee cannot fix:
| Scan item |
Pass condition |
| Dynamic-model centrality |
the abstract names a model class and a mechanism, not just a dataset |
| Quantitative core complete |
every exhibit final; no placeholder counterfactuals |
| Calibration auditable |
a parameter table with sources/targets appears in the draft |
| Computation disclosed |
solution method and an accuracy statement appear in text or appendix |
| Archive runnable today |
run-all executes end to end before you pay the fee |
Paying USD 195 for a paper that will stall at the suitability screen is the most expensive formatting
error at this journal: the fee is per submission and the screen happens before referees see anything.
Fee-path micro-decisions
- Mixed team (one student, one faculty): the USD 100 rate does not apply — every coauthor must be a
full-time student at submission.
- Resubmission rounds: first invited resubmissions pay again; second-and-later resubmissions are exempt —
confirm which round your revision counts as against Editorial Manager before paying again.
- Fee paid but desk-rejected: the fee is sunk; do not resubmit a cosmetic revision, since the same
suitability screen applies.
- Source precedence: the SED author page still carries an older 175 US dollar amount, while the active Elsevier
Guide/payment workflow lists USD 195; use the Guide amount for live preflight.
Upload-order note
Stage files so Editorial Manager builds a clean review PDF: manuscript with embedded exhibits for the
first round (allowed under "your paper your way"), then appendices, then declarations. Check the
system-built PDF renders all model equations, IRF figures, and fonts before approving the submission —
a garbled Bellman equation at the desk screen is a self-inflicted wound.
Output format
【Fee】USD 195 / 100 (all-student) / exempt (2nd+ resubmission)? [which]
【Route】ScienceDirect → Editorial Manager? [Y/N]
【Anonymization】left non-anonymized (single-anonymized)? [Y/N]
【Front matter】abstract ≤250w / 1-6 keywords / author-year refs? [Y/N each]
【Declarations】AI-use declared? [Y/N]
【Data/replication】archive staged; Option C statement/repository metadata prepared; exemption flagged if needed? [Y/N]
【Next step】await desk screen → red-review-process → red-rebuttal on R&R
Supplementary resources