Skills Development Codebase Gap Analysis and Validation

Codebase Gap Analysis and Validation

v20260415
kiro-validate-gap
This skill analyzes the implementation gap by comparing approved feature requirements against the existing codebase, architecture, and context. It helps identify missing capabilities, potential integration challenges, and necessary technical research areas. The output provides multiple viable implementation options and a comprehensive analysis report, guiding the transition from requirements definition to technical design.
Get Skill
493 downloads
Overview

Implementation Gap Validation

<background_information>

  • Mission: Analyze the gap between requirements and existing codebase to inform implementation strategy
  • Success Criteria:
    • Comprehensive understanding of existing codebase patterns and components
    • Clear identification of missing capabilities and integration challenges
    • Multiple viable implementation approaches evaluated
    • Technical research needs identified for design phase </background_information>
## Core Task Analyze implementation gap for feature **$1** based on approved requirements and existing codebase.

Execution Steps

  1. Load Context:

    • Read {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/spec.json for language and metadata
    • Read {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/requirements.md for requirements
    • Core steering context: product.md, tech.md, structure.md
    • Additional steering files only when directly relevant to the feature's domain rules, integrations, runtime prerequisites, compliance/security constraints, or existing product boundaries
    • Relevant local agent skills or playbooks only when they clearly match the feature's host environment or use case and provide analysis-relevant context
  2. Read Analysis Guidelines:

    • Read rules/gap-analysis.md from this skill's directory for comprehensive analysis framework

Parallel Research

The following research areas are independent and can be executed in parallel:

  1. Codebase analysis: Existing implementations, architecture patterns, integration points, extension possibilities
  2. External dependency research: Dependency compatibility, version constraints, known integration challenges (when needed)
  3. Context loading: Requirements, core steering, task-relevant extra steering, relevant local agent skills/playbooks, and gap-analysis rules

If multi-agent is enabled, spawn sub-agents for each area above. Otherwise execute sequentially.

After all parallel research completes, synthesize findings for gap analysis.

  1. Execute Gap Analysis:

    • Follow gap-analysis.md framework for thorough investigation
    • Analyze existing codebase using Grep and Read tools
    • Use WebSearch/WebFetch for external dependency research if needed
    • Evaluate multiple implementation approaches (extend/new/hybrid)
    • Use language specified in spec.json for output
  2. Generate Analysis Document:

    • Create comprehensive gap analysis following the output guidelines in gap-analysis.md
    • Present multiple viable options with trade-offs
    • Flag areas requiring further research
  3. Write Gap Analysis to Disk:

    Write the gap analysis to disk so it survives session boundaries and can be referenced during design phase.

    • Save the gap analysis to {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/research.md
    • If the file already exists, append the new analysis (separated by a horizontal rule ---) rather than overwriting previous research
    • Verify the file was written by reading it back

Important Constraints

  • Information over Decisions: Provide analysis and options, not final implementation choices
  • Multiple Options: Present viable alternatives when applicable
  • Thorough Investigation: Use tools to deeply understand existing codebase
  • Explicit Gaps: Clearly flag areas needing research or investigation
  • Context Discipline: Start with core steering and expand only with analysis-relevant steering or use-case-aligned local agent skills/playbooks

Tool Guidance

  • Read first: Load spec, core steering, relevant local playbooks/agent skills, and rules before analysis
  • Grep extensively: Search codebase for patterns, conventions, and integration points
  • WebSearch/WebFetch: Research external dependencies and best practices when needed
  • Write last: Generate analysis only after complete investigation

Output Description

Provide output in the language specified in spec.json with:

  1. Analysis Summary: Brief overview (3-5 bullets) of scope, challenges, and recommendations
  2. Document Status: Confirm analysis approach used
  3. Next Steps: Guide user on proceeding to design phase

Format Requirements:

  • Use Markdown headings for clarity
  • Keep summary concise (under 300 words)
  • Detailed analysis follows gap-analysis.md output guidelines

Safety & Fallback

Error Scenarios

  • Missing Requirements: If requirements.md doesn't exist, stop with message: "Run /kiro-spec-requirements $1 first to generate requirements"
  • Requirements Not Approved: If requirements not approved, warn user but proceed (gap analysis can inform requirement revisions)
  • Empty Steering Directory: Warn user that project context is missing and may affect analysis quality
  • Complex Integration Unclear: Flag for comprehensive research in design phase rather than blocking
  • Language Undefined: Default to English (en) if spec.json doesn't specify language

Next Phase: Design Generation

If Gap Analysis Complete:

  • Review gap analysis insights
  • Run /kiro-spec-design $1 to create technical design document
  • Or /kiro-spec-design $1 -y to auto-approve requirements and proceed directly

Note: Gap analysis is optional but recommended for brownfield projects to inform design decisions.

Info
Category Development
Name kiro-validate-gap
Version v20260415
Size 5.33KB
Updated At 2026-04-24
Language