Skills Development Structured Task Planning Framework

Structured Task Planning Framework

v20260427
plan-writing
This skill provides a rigorous framework for tackling complex software development tasks. It guides users to break down large features, refactoring efforts, or bug fixes into small, actionable, and independently verifiable steps. By focusing on clear outcomes, dependencies, and specific verification criteria, it ensures that the implementation process is structured, manageable, and traceable from start to finish.
Get Skill
328 downloads
Overview

Plan Writing

Source: obra/superpowers

Overview

This skill provides a framework for breaking down work into clear, actionable tasks with verification criteria.

Task Breakdown Principles

1. Small, Focused Tasks

  • Each task should take 2-5 minutes
  • One clear outcome per task
  • Independently verifiable

2. Clear Verification

  • How do you know it's done?
  • What can you check/test?
  • What's the expected output?

3. Logical Ordering

  • Dependencies identified
  • Parallel work where possible
  • Critical path highlighted
  • Phase X: Verification is always LAST

4. Dynamic Naming in Project Root

  • Plan files are saved as {task-slug}.md in the PROJECT ROOT
  • Name derived from task (e.g., "add auth" โ†’ auth-feature.md)
  • NEVER inside .claude/, docs/, or temp folders

Planning Principles (NOT Templates!)

๐Ÿ”ด NO fixed templates. Each plan is UNIQUE to the task.

Principle 1: Keep It SHORT

โŒ Wrong โœ… Right
50 tasks with sub-sub-tasks 5-10 clear tasks max
Every micro-step listed Only actionable items
Verbose descriptions One-line per task

Rule: If plan is longer than 1 page, it's too long. Simplify.


Principle 2: Be SPECIFIC, Not Generic

โŒ Wrong โœ… Right
"Set up project" "Run npx create-next-app"
"Add authentication" "Install next-auth, create /api/auth/[...nextauth].ts"
"Style the UI" "Add Tailwind classes to Header.tsx"

Rule: Each task should have a clear, verifiable outcome.


Principle 3: Dynamic Content Based on Project Type

For NEW PROJECT:

  • What tech stack? (decide first)
  • What's the MVP? (minimal features)
  • What's the file structure?

For FEATURE ADDITION:

  • Which files are affected?
  • What dependencies needed?
  • How to verify it works?

For BUG FIX:

  • What's the root cause?
  • What file/line to change?
  • How to test the fix?

Principle 4: Scripts Are Project-Specific

๐Ÿ”ด DO NOT copy-paste script commands. Choose based on project type.

Project Type Relevant Scripts
Frontend/React ux_audit.py, accessibility_checker.py
Backend/API api_validator.py, security_scan.py
Mobile mobile_audit.py
Database schema_validator.py
Full-stack Mix of above based on what you touched

Wrong: Adding all scripts to every plan Right: Only scripts relevant to THIS task


Principle 5: Verification is Simple

โŒ Wrong โœ… Right
"Verify the component works correctly" "Run npm run dev, click button, see toast"
"Test the API" "curl localhost:3000/api/users returns 200"
"Check styles" "Open browser, verify dark mode toggle works"

Plan Structure (Flexible, Not Fixed!)

# [Task Name]

## Goal
One sentence: What are we building/fixing?

## Tasks
- [ ] Task 1: [Specific action] โ†’ Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 2: [Specific action] โ†’ Verify: [How to check]
- [ ] Task 3: [Specific action] โ†’ Verify: [How to check]

## Done When
- [ ] [Main success criteria]

That's it. No phases, no sub-sections unless truly needed. Keep it minimal. Add complexity only when required.

Notes

[Any important considerations]


---

## Best Practices (Quick Reference)

1. **Start with goal** - What are we building/fixing?
2. **Max 10 tasks** - If more, break into multiple plans
3. **Each task verifiable** - Clear "done" criteria
4. **Project-specific** - No copy-paste templates
5. **Update as you go** - Mark `[x]` when complete

---

## When to Use
- New project from scratch
- Adding a feature
- Fixing a bug (if complex)
- Refactoring multiple files

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Info
Category Development
Name plan-writing
Version v20260427
Size 4.24KB
Updated At 2026-04-28
Language