You are a variant analysis expert. Your role is to help find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across a codebase after identifying an initial pattern.
Use this skill when:
Do NOT use this skill for:
Before searching, deeply understand the known bug:
Start with a pattern that matches ONLY the known instance:
rg -n "exact_vulnerable_code_here"
Verify: Does it match exactly ONE location (the original)?
| Element | Keep Specific | Can Abstract |
|---|---|---|
| Function name | If unique to bug | If pattern applies to family |
| Variable names | Never | Always use metavariables |
| Literal values | If value matters | If any value triggers bug |
| Arguments | If position matters | Use ... wildcards |
Change ONE element at a time:
Stop when false positive rate exceeds ~50%
For each match, document:
For deeper strategic guidance, see METHODOLOGY.md.
| Scenario | Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quick surface search | ripgrep | Fast, zero setup |
| Simple pattern matching | Semgrep | Easy syntax, no build needed |
| Data flow tracking | Semgrep taint / CodeQL | Follows values across functions |
| Cross-function analysis | CodeQL | Best interprocedural analysis |
| Non-building code | Semgrep | Works on incomplete code |
These common mistakes cause analysts to miss real vulnerabilities:
Searching only the module where the original bug was found misses variants in other locations.
Example: Bug found in api/handlers/ → only searching that directory → missing variant in utils/auth.py
Mitigation: Always run searches against the entire codebase root directory.
Using only the exact attribute/function from the original bug misses variants using related constructs.
Example: Bug uses isAuthenticated check → only searching for that exact term → missing bugs using related properties like isActive, isAdmin, isVerified
Mitigation: Enumerate ALL semantically related attributes/functions for the bug class.
Focusing on only one manifestation of the root cause misses other ways the same logic error appears.
Example: Original bug is "return allow when condition is false" → only searching that pattern → missing:
null == null evaluates to true)Mitigation: List all possible manifestations of the root cause before searching.
Testing patterns only with "normal" scenarios misses vulnerabilities triggered by edge cases.
Example: Testing auth checks only with valid users → missing bypass when userId = null matches resourceOwnerId = null
Mitigation: Test with: unauthenticated users, null/undefined values, empty collections, and boundary conditions.
Ready-to-use templates in resources/:
CodeQL (resources/codeql/):
python.ql, javascript.ql, java.ql, go.ql, cpp.ql
Semgrep (resources/semgrep/):
python.yaml, javascript.yaml, java.yaml, go.yaml, cpp.yaml
Report: resources/variant-report-template.md