v5 → v6 Migration Patterns

Overview

v6 replaces v5's plugin-based architecture with feature-based DI. The key shifts:

Pattern 1: Context Plugin → DI Service

v5

new ContextPlugin(async context => {
  context.lingotekService = {
    translate: async (docId, locale) => {
      /* ... */
    },
    getStatus: async docId => {
      /* ... */
    },
    deleteProject: async projectId => {
      /* ... */
    }
  };
});

v6

// features/lingotekService/abstractions.ts
import { createAbstraction } from "@webiny/feature/api";

export interface ILingotekService {
  translate(docId: string, locale: string): Promise<Result<void, Error>>;
  getStatus(docId: string): Promise<Result<TranslationStatus, Error>>;
  deleteProject(projectId: string): Promise<Result<void, Error>>;
}

export const LingotekService = createAbstraction<ILingotekService>("MyExt/LingotekService");

export namespace LingotekService {
  export type Interface = ILingotekService;
}

// features/lingotekService/LingotekService.ts
class LingotekServiceImpl implements LingotekService.Interface {
  constructor(private buildParams: BuildParams.Interface) {}

  async translate(docId: string, locale: string) {
    /* ... */
  }
  async getStatus(docId: string) {
    /* ... */
  }
  async deleteProject(projectId: string) {
    /* ... */
  }
}

export default LingotekService.createImplementation({
  implementation: LingotekServiceImpl,
  dependencies: [BuildParams]
});

// features/lingotekService/feature.ts
export const LingotekServiceFeature = createFeature({
  name: "LingotekService",
  register(container) {
    container.register(LingotekServiceImpl).inSingletonScope();
  }
});

Key difference: v5 attaches to context object. v6 uses DI — consumers declare the service as a constructor dependency.

Pattern 2: Event Subscription → EventHandler Feature

v5

context.cms.onEntryAfterCreate.subscribe(async params => {
  if (params.model.modelId !== "myModel") return;
  await doSomething(params.entry);
});

v6

// features/syncOnCreate/EntryAfterCreateHandler.ts
import { EntryAfterCreateEventHandler } from "webiny/api/cms/entry";
import { LingotekService } from "../lingotekService/abstractions.js";
import { MY_MODEL_ID } from "~/shared/constants.js";

class SyncOnCreateHandler implements EntryAfterCreateEventHandler.Interface {
  constructor(private lingotekService: LingotekService.Interface) {}

  async handle(event: EntryAfterCreateEventHandler.Event) {
    const { entry, model } = event.payload;
    if (model.modelId !== MY_MODEL_ID) return;
    await this.lingotekService.translate(entry.entryId, "en");
  }
}

export default EntryAfterCreateEventHandler.createImplementation({
  implementation: SyncOnCreateHandler,
  dependencies: [LingotekService]
});

// features/syncOnCreate/feature.ts
export const SyncOnCreateFeature = createFeature({
  name: "SyncOnCreate",
  register(container) {
    container.register(SyncOnCreateHandler);
  }
});

Key differences:

• Feature directory is named by business capability (syncOnCreate), not by event name
• Handler is a thin orchestrator — business logic lives in the injected service
• Must filter by model.modelId — handler fires for ALL models

Pattern 3: Plugin Array → Feature Registration

v5

export default () => [
    new GraphQLSchemaPlugin({ ... }),
    new ContextPlugin(async ctx => { ... }),
    myModelPlugin,
    eventSubscriptionPlugin
];

v6

// api/Extension.ts
import { createFeature } from "webiny/api";

export const Extension = createFeature({
  name: "MyExtension",
  register(container) {
    container.register(MyModel);
    container.register(MyGraphQLSchema);
    SyncOnCreateFeature.register(container);
    LingotekServiceFeature.register(container);
  }
});

Pattern 4: Async Service Bootstrap → ServiceProvider Pattern

When a v5 service was initialized with async data (loading settings, fetching config), v6 uses the ServiceProvider pattern — a provider abstraction with async getService() that lazily creates and caches the service.

See the ServiceProvider Pattern section in webiny-api-architect for the full pattern with abstractions, implementation, and consumer examples.

Pattern 6: Permissions objects

v5

[
  {
    name: "content.i18n",
    locales: ["en-US"]
  },
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.read"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.manage"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.preview"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentModelGroup",
    groups: {
      "en-US": [LT_TRANSLATION_MODEL_GROUP_ID]
    },
    rwd: "rw",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentModel",
    models: {
      "en-US": [
        LT_TRANSLATION_DOCUMENT_MODEL_ID,
        LT_CONFIG_MODEL_ID,
        LT_TRANSLATION_PROJECT_MODEL_ID
      ]
    },
    rwd: "rwd",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentEntry",
    rwd: "rwd",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  }
];

v6

• content.i18n no longer exists
• locale codes no longer exist
• models is an array of model.modelId strings
• groups is an array of group.slug strings

[
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.read"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.manage"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.endpoint.preview"
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentModelGroup",
    groups: ["LT_TRANSLATION_MODEL_GROUP_ID"],
    rwd: "rw",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentModel",
    models: [
      "LT_TRANSLATION_DOCUMENT_MODEL_ID",
      "LT_CONFIG_MODEL_ID",
      "LT_TRANSLATION_PROJECT_MODEL_ID"
    ],
    rwd: "rwd",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  },
  {
    name: "cms.contentEntry",
    rwd: "rwd",
    own: false,
    pw: ""
  }
];

Type Resolution Guide

When working with Webiny abstractions, always verify types from source before writing code.

Step 1: Find the catalog entry

Use MCP skills or generated catalogs to look up the abstraction (e.g., RoleFactory).

Step 2: Get the source path

The catalog entry includes a Source field pointing to the abstraction definition.

Step 3: Read the type definition

# Read the abstractions file
cat node_modules/@webiny/api-core/features/security/roles/shared/abstractions.d.ts

Common type patterns

Migration Map: v5 → v6 Equivalents

Backend: Context Method Calls → Use Cases

Backend: Lifecycle Event Subscriptions → EventHandlers

Backend: Plugin Classes → v6 Equivalents

Admin: React Plugins → AdminConfig API

Common Migration Mistakes

1. Creating one abstraction per operation

v5 habit: separate plugins per action. v6: group related operations into a multi-method Service.

2. Naming features by technical event

v5 habit: thinking in terms of hooks (onEntryAfterCreate). v6: features describe business capability (syncToLingotek). Files inside can be named technically (EntryAfterCreateHandler.ts).

3. Assuming builder patterns

v6 factories sometimes return plain objects, sometimes builder objects. Always read source types first, to understand what the factory in question returns.

4. Putting event handlers in a handlers/ directory

v5 habit: grouping by type. v6: handlers are features — they go in features/.

5. Attaching to context

v5: context.myService = { ... }. v6: create an abstraction and register it in the DI container via the parent feature, or a standalone feature (createFeature).

6. Inline business logic in event handlers

v5 habit: putting logic directly in the subscription callback. v6: handlers are thin orchestrators — extract logic into a Service or UseCase.

Related Skills

• webiny-api-architect — Full v6 architecture, Services vs UseCases, anti-patterns
• webiny-use-case-pattern — UseCase implementation details
• webiny-event-handler-pattern — EventHandler and domain event patterns
• webiny-dependency-injection — DI pattern and injectable services