Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for developing, optimizing, and standardizing skills for AI agents. This resource provides a decision tree for choosing the right architecture (Tier 1-3), incorporating best practices like CSO (LLM SEO) and Anti-Rationalization, and ensuring compliance through rigorous testing and checklists. Essential for robust AI system building.

Audits GitHub Actions workflows that invoke AI coding agents to surface prompt injection and sandbox risks, tracing attacker-controlled inputs through env vars, reusable actions, and workflow references before deployment or code review.

A comprehensive guide covering patterns and architectures for automating code execution using LLMs. It spans simple sequential pipelines (e.g., daily dev scripts) to advanced, RFC-driven multi-agent Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) orchestration. Ideal for building CI/CD style continuous development pipelines, managing complex state, and automating quality gates without human intervention.

Explains when to call the code-reviewer subagent, how to collect SHAs, fill the template, and act on its feedback so every task, feature, or merge meets quality expectations.

A comprehensive security scanner designed to audit AI agent skills before deployment. It analyzes source code (Python, Bash, JS), detects critical vulnerabilities like command injection, network exfiltration, and unsafe deserialization. Furthermore, it scans markdown files for prompt injection attacks, and assesses dependency supply chain risks, providing a clear PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict and remediation guidance.

Performs static security analysis on GitHub Actions workflows that incorporate AI coding agents (e.g., Claude, Gemini, OpenAI). This skill helps identify critical data flow vulnerabilities, such as where attacker-controlled input can reach AI agent prompts or internal systems via CI/CD pipelines, going beyond simple expression checks.

This comprehensive guide outlines a rigorous, human-in-the-loop engineering workflow for leveraging advanced AI agents to complete complex implementation tasks. It mandates defining clear completion criteria, decomposing work into manageable units, and strategically routing models (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus) based on task complexity. The workflow emphasizes continuous evaluation, regression testing, security review of invariants and edge cases, and strict cost discipline to ensure robust and reliable software development using AI assistance.

A guide for creating and maintaining the canonical `AGENTS.md` file. This skill enforces minimal, high-signal documentation, ensuring agents receive concise instructions regarding package management, file-scoped commands, and project conventions, while strictly omitting filler or obvious context.

This model provides an engineering operational framework for teams that leverage AI agents to generate large volumes of code. It shifts the focus from simple syntax to process quality, robust architecture design, rigorous testing, and systematic risk control, ensuring the development of highly stable and reliable systems in AI-assisted environments.

This comprehensive guide details how to set up and configure AWS Machine Capability Platform (MCP) servers for advanced AI agent use. It provides two options: a Full AWS MCP Server (for API calls and documentation search) and a basic AWS Documentation MCP (for documentation search only). Instructions cover prerequisites, configuration methods (via JSON settings), necessary IAM permissions, and troubleshooting tips for seamless integration of AWS services into AI workflows.

An expert agent focused on enhancing code clarity, consistency, and maintainability. It simplifies complex code structures, eliminates redundant logic, and applies project-specific best practices, all while guaranteeing that the original functionality and behavior remain absolutely unchanged. Ideal for code reviews, cleanup tasks, or improving readability.

Use this command to set up a structured multi-agent collaboration environment within AgentHub. It allows you to define the core task, specify the required number of agents, and configure detailed evaluation criteria (metrics, directions, and commands) for both quantitative benchmarking and qualitative LLM judging. This is the starting point for any agent competition or complex AI workflow.