Skill UI

This comprehensive skill guides researchers through assessing whether their operations and supply chain manuscript meets the rigorous standards of the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It covers key areas including theoretical framing, empirical rigor (e.g., common-method bias, identification), structural best practices, and common desk-reject triggers, helping authors refine their work for high-impact academic publishing.

A comprehensive CSSCI-level academic journal focusing on the full spectrum of sport science, including athletic training, exercise science, and sport humanities. It possesses a distinct strength in winter and ice sports research, making it the ideal venue for submitting well-evidenced, rigorous, and interdisciplinary studies, especially those related to the Northeast Chinese region's winter sports context.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final pre-submission review for the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM). It ensures the manuscript is properly anonymized (double-blind), confirms adherence to membership/fee requirements, and verifies all necessary metadata, data availability statements, and formatting standards before upload to the Wiley Research Exchange platform.

A comprehensive final check guide for authors submitting to the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). This checklist covers critical elements such as double-blind anonymization, strict word count adherence (including all components), OUP author-date styling, data availability, and required declarations, ensuring the manuscript is ready for Editorial Express.

This guide provides detailed instructions on writing the policy implications section for manuscripts submitted to quantitative journals (like JQTE). It emphasizes grounding all policy recommendations in the paper's specific quantitative findings (measurement, forecasting, or decomposition results), ensuring the advice is actionable, timely, and relevant to planning, industry, and technology decisions.

Systematically transforms high-level ideas or goals into a detailed, structured, and executable taskbook designed for AI agents. This process involves deep research, validation against existing codebases, adherence to strict formatting rules, and generating a single, copy-pastable block of instructions for immediate agent execution. It distinguishes between execution and exploration tasks, ensuring all steps are verifiable and anti-cheating measures are included.

This skill guides researchers in refining broad philosophical topics into sharply focused, significant, and defensible theses. It teaches the rigorous process of ensuring a proposed project meets high academic standards—specifically requiring a clear, debatable claim, relevance to live debates, and scope manageable within a defined length. Use this to pressure-test your ideas before committing to writing.

This guide provides a structured methodology for authors to articulate the core contribution of their Information Systems (IS) research for top-tier academic journals, such as MIS Quarterly. It ensures that the paper explicitly states the new knowledge produced (e.g., behavioral mechanisms, design principles, economic effects), justifies the manuscript's length, and rigorously connects theoretical advances with practical and societal implications, thereby avoiding claims of being merely 'incremental' or 'technical' exercises.

A comprehensive guide for authors to position their ML systems research by mapping the vast, scattered literature across multiple venues (OSDI, SOSP, NeurIPS, open-source projects). It details how to audit novelty, handle fast-moving advancements, and write a defensible delta statement against both academic and industrial prior work.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to mobile and wireless networking conferences (e.g., MobiCom). It emphasizes structuring the paper around measured evidence, ensuring every claim is paired with a precise operating regime and empirical proof. Key sections cover the 'first-page arc,' reporting distributions instead of superlatives, and managing the manuscript's page budget for maximum impact.

This guide helps researchers determine if their core contribution—a mobile or embedded system, application, or service running on a device—is best suited for the MobiSys conference. It provides detailed criteria for venue selection, distinguishing between contributions for MobiSys, MobiCom, SenSys, NSDI/OSDI, and other related top-tier venues, ensuring authors route their work to the most appropriate academic community.

This framework guides the creation of mandatory STAR Methods, ensuring scientific manuscripts meet the highest standards of transparency and reproducibility. It mandates the systematic inclusion of Key Resources Tables (KRT), detailed resource availability, experimental model specifications, step-by-step methods, and consolidated statistical analysis (QSA). Ideal for researchers needing to structure complex biological or chemical research findings for publication.