Skill UI

A robust Python client wrapper for interacting with the Zotero Web API v3. This skill allows users to programmatically manage academic references, including retrieving, creating, updating, and deleting items, collections, tags, and attachments. Ideal for academic researchers building automated workflows, bulk exporting citations (e.g., BibTeX), or integrating Zotero data into larger research applications.

This skill automates the complex and tedious process of porting academic papers written in LaTeX from one publisher's journal template (e.g., Springer) to another (e.g., MDPI, IEEE). It executes a structured multi-stage workflow, including content extraction, structural mapping, systematic fixing of common LaTeX issues (like float placement and math environments), and final compilation to ensure the output adheres to the target journal's specifications.

This tool systematically generates, validates, and ranks concrete, publishable research ideas based on a broad research direction provided by the user. It guides the user through the entire idea discovery pipeline, from initial landscape survey (Phase 1) to validation (novelty checks, experiments) and review, ensuring the generated ideas are novel and relevant for academic publication. It manages complex workflow orchestration and utilizes multiple external tools.

This comprehensive pipeline guides users from a vague research concept to a fully structured, testable academic proposal. It first refines the core methodology (research-refine) to establish a stable thesis, and then generates a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap (experiment-plan). This end-to-end workflow ensures that the final academic output is both elegant and empirically validated.

A comprehensive orchestrator managing the entire academic research lifecycle, from initial research ideation through drafting, rigorous integrity checks, multi-stage peer review, revision, and final publication. It coordinates deep research, paper drafting, and review processes into a structured, reproducible, and quality-gated 10-stage workflow, ensuring academic integrity at every step.

A comprehensive tool for finding solutions to software errors, API usage issues, and compatibility problems by searching major developer communities, official documentation, GitHub, Stack Exchange, and various Chinese technical forums. Ideal for debugging and discovery workflows, it aggregates real-world workarounds and technical Q&A, but results should not be cited as academic evidence.

This is the comprehensive orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the correct submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) and ensuring critical steps, such as mandatory third-party code verification, are integrated from the start. It dispatches to specific sub-skills rather than drafting content.

This workflow guides the entire process of writing an authoritative, invited review article for the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc). It systematically routes the author through the academic lifecycle, covering stages from topic selection and systematic literature synthesis to imposing an organizing framework and final revision, ensuring the output is a comprehensive analytical map of a subfield.

A comprehensive, step-by-step guide for researchers planning and executing a submission to the ASE (Automated Software Engineering) conference. Covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence gathering (reproducibility) to abstract registration, double-anonymous submission, navigating the early-rejection gate, rebuttal, criteria-bound revision, and final camera-ready artifact submission.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist tailored for submitting high-level, long-form academic papers to prestigious Chinese journals, such as the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It guides authors through critical checks covering formatting standards, ethical guidelines (plagiarism and self-plagiarism), required components (abstracts, keywords, citations), and the optimal submission workflow, ensuring the manuscript meets the stringent requirements of top-tier academic publications.

This guide provides a comprehensive model of the academic review process used at FAccT. It details the interdisciplinary nature of the review panel (CS, law, social science), the OpenReview workflow, and the strategic implications of the 'Accept/Revise/Reject' decision set. It guides authors on navigating the stages, including rebuttals and revise-and-resubmissions.

This guide provides a comprehensive backward planning workflow for submitting a full paper to the ACM/IEEE HRI conference. It warns researchers that the most critical and time-consuming steps—such as IRB approval, participant recruitment, and data collection—must be planned months in advance, often taking longer than the writing process. It maps out the entire academic cycle, from initial abstract submission through to camera-ready preparation, including parallel tracks like alt.HRI and Late-Breaking Reports.