Skill UI

A comprehensive multi-agent feedback loop inspired by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), designed to build complex, production-ready applications. It separates generation from evaluation, using a 'ruthlessly strict' evaluator (QA) to drive continuous iteration. This process ensures high design quality, robust functionality, and originality, overcoming the limitations of single-agent self-critique. Ideal for full-stack feature development and complex product specification implementation.

Build with and use Pi, a minimal terminal coding harness. Covers install, provider and model config, TypeScript extensions, skills, packages, themes, SDK embedding, RPC and JSON event streams, session parsing, local llama.cpp models, custom providers, TUI components, and ecosystem packages like pi-subagents and pi-mcp-adapter.

This skill designs and audits the core engineering harness required for reliable AI agent collaboration within a codebase. It establishes critical infrastructure elements such as change tracking, linting rules, CI/CD gates, and standardized documentation, ensuring the repository remains the single source of truth for all intelligent agents. Ideal for setting up complex development workflows.

This skill enables the creation of a robust 'harness' system for coding agents within a repository. It addresses the need to prevent repeated AI-generated coding mistakes by implementing durable instructions, guardrails, regression tests, and failure memory. It treats the target repository as the source of truth, ensuring consistency and maintaining high reliability across all automated contributions.

This skill acts as a comprehensive maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin repository. It executes a rigorous, sequential subagent pipeline—including authoring, evaluation, QA, trigger auditing, and release management. Use this when adding, editing, or updating skills to ensure all related components (manifests, README, CHANGELOG) are synchronized and adhere to strict quality gates throughout the development lifecycle.

A systematic framework for agents to drive goals to verified completion. It compiles goals into task plans, executes tasks sequentially, verifies results via subprocesses, manages retries, and escalates on failure. Ensures rigorous verification and state management for complex domain tasks.

A formal framework designed for evaluating AI-assisted code generation sessions. It implements Development Oriented Evals (EDD) principles, allowing users to define capability and regression criteria. The system supports multiple evaluation types—code-based, model-based, and human review—and tracks reliability using advanced metrics like pass@k, ensuring robust quality control for AI agents.

A comprehensive 7-section report providing a deep assessment of a repository's health and readiness level. It calculates key metrics including risk score, agent topology recommendations, MCP surface area, test confidence, and publish readiness. This tool is vital for pre-mint reviews, detecting architectural drift, and enforcing strict CI/CD quality gates.

A comprehensive, stack-agnostic tool for deeply evaluating agent harnesses. It checks for broken code paths, redundant instructions, and the overall usefulness of agent logic using a structured, multi-stage dual-judge protocol. The process involves high-priority questionnaires (Q1, Q2) before running three defined tracks: A (Correctness), B (Redundancy), and C (Usefulness). Ideal for auditing complex agent systems before deployment or major refactoring.

This skill addresses the common problem of documentation decay in long-lived software projects. It establishes a canonical governance layer by assigning four non-overlapping roles—Constitution, Map, Status, and History—to existing documentation. By linking these roles to the active agent harness, it prevents documentation drift, ensuring that all project information remains accurate, authoritative, and contextually linked to the current codebase, making it ideal for the maintenance phase.

This skill enables deterministic fault injection testing for agent workflows to verify recovery mechanisms, state preservation, and safety boundaries. It generates fault matrices and event timelines to distinguish between recovered, contained, and unrecoverable failures without impacting production systems or real user data.

Orchestrates sequential subagent stages to maintain the brooks-lint plugin: author, eval, QA, trigger audit, and release, with PASS/FAIL gating and document sync checks.