Skill UI

This guide provides crucial advice for authors submitting to conferences with severe page limitations, such as DAC. It teaches the 'decision-criticality test' to help authors allocate content, ensuring that only core, review-mandated arguments remain in the main body, while supporting details and code can be moved to external repositories.

This guide provides expert advice on structuring academic research papers, specifically tailored for EACL submissions. It details the optimal placement of core arguments, limitations, findings, and supplemental code across the content body, appendices, and supplementary archives, ensuring that decision-critical information is always visible to reviewers.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors preparing submissions for the ECAI conference. It details critical steps including selecting the correct submission regime (standalone vs. joint), managing page budgets (7-page body limit), ensuring double-blind anonymity, and adhering to strict deadlines for abstract and full paper submissions. Essential reading before uploading to the conference portal.

This comprehensive guide helps authors structure and partition their research findings for top-tier academic conferences, such as USENIX FAST. It defines the strict rules for separating core, decision-critical evidence (which must reside in the main body) from supporting materials, artifacts, and appendices, ensuring compliance with page budgets and double-blind review standards.

This comprehensive guide details the stringent process of preparing an accepted scholarly paper for publication in LIPIcs proceedings. It covers mandatory steps including converting to the specific `lipics-v2021` class, systematic de-anonymization (restoring authors, ORCIDs, and acknowledgements), completing rich metadata (ACM CCS, keywords, funding), and reconciling the final body text with the public full version. Essential reading for ensuring smooth production.

This comprehensive guide serves as an audit checklist for authors preparing submissions for ICALP (EATCS International Colloquium). It covers crucial academic submission logistics, including selecting the correct track (A or B), understanding the two-step deadline process (abstract registration and full submission), adhering to the 15-page body limit, and executing lightweight double-blind anonymity checks to prevent identifying metadata leaks. Essential reading before final upload.

Provides crucial guidelines for structuring research papers submitted to ICDM. It details how the 10-page IEEE limit must accommodate the body, in-cap appendices, and references, while effectively offloading bulk material (code, full logs) to an external repository. Essential for avoiding rejection due to page overruns.

A comprehensive guide for assembling supplementary materials for ICSME papers. It strictly outlines how to partition research findings, core techniques, and evidence between the limited 10-page body and the supplementary artifact. The key principle is that the paper must be fully judgeable from the reviewed pages alone, ensuring decision-critical evidence is never relegated solely to the appendix.

A comprehensive audit checklist for submitting papers to the INFOCOM conference. It covers critical compliance aspects, including the two-step abstract registration process, strict IEEEtran formatting rules (9-page body limit), mandatory double-blind anonymization, and adherence to author submission caps. Use this guide to ensure your manuscript meets all technical and procedural requirements before the deadline.

This guide establishes standards for reporting reproducibility in robotics research, addressing the difference between traditional ML and physical systems. It mandates that every claim must be classified as either 'rerunnable' (executable code/simulation) or 'auditable' (detailed logs, hardware specs, and protocols). It covers creating a complete evidence map, detailing the hardware specification ledger, explicitly reporting the sim-to-real gap, and writing an honest availability statement, all within the main paper body.

This guide details the crucial rules for structuring a scientific paper submitted to conferences like ITCS. It dictates how content—including main theorems, proofs, and motivation—must be distributed across three locations: the main body, the submitted appendix, and the external full version (arXiv). The core principle ensures that all decision-critical evidence for accepting the paper resides within the submitted PDF, preventing reviewers from relying on external or unread preprints.

This guide helps authors structure highly technical security papers, especially for venues with strict page limits like NDSS. It details how to allocate content across the main body, ethics considerations, and appendices, ensuring the core decision-making arguments remain self-contained and maximally persuasive to reviewers by passing the 'dependency test'.