Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive guide to submitting primary research in catalysis to ACS Catalysis. It helps authors assess whether their work meets the journal's high standards, which require an interlocking case of activity/selectivity data, advanced characterization, and robust mechanistic insight. Use it for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and understanding the rigorous evidence bar expected in modern catalysis research (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electro-, etc.).

This comprehensive guide helps authors stress-test their manuscripts against the highly specialized and rigorous objections typically raised by expert referees for the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It provides a crucial checklist to pre-empt common criticisms regarding assumptions, theoretical positioning, proof completeness, and general contribution, significantly improving the manuscript's readiness for submission.

This guide helps researchers determine if their microeconomic theory, model, or experiment is suitable for American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It provides a structured framework for evaluating the contribution's scope, assessing broad microeconomic interest, and differentiating the appropriate venue from competing specialist journals like JET, Econometrica, or AEJ: Applied.

This skill acts as a central workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy (AEJ: Policy). It diagnoses the current stage of a paper—whether it's topic selection, design, modeling, writing, or rebuttal—and recommends the next specialized skill. It ensures the research maintains a strong focus on credible causal evidence and actionable policy implications.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router, guiding users through the specific stages of writing a short-format manuscript for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights). It helps structure the process from initial topic selection and identifying a single core insight, through literature positioning, model refinement, and final submission/rebuttal preparation, ensuring compliance with strict length and scope requirements.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing the Related Work section for high-impact journals (e.g., Acta Electronica Sinica). It teaches how to structure the review critically, moving beyond mere chronology to organize by technical path, defining scope, articulating clear technical deficiencies, and precisely positioning the paper's novelty against state-of-the-art methods.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers position their academic paper for AISTATS, ensuring maximum novelty and eligibility. It provides detailed advice on comparative analysis, teaching authors how to contrast statistical methods against both modern ML literature (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML) and established statistical theory (e.g., JASA, Annals of Statistics). It covers proper citation of concurrent work, understanding archival status, and structuring the 'Related Work' section to highlight unique technical contributions.

This guide helps authors strategically position their academic work within the existing body of sociological literature. It teaches how to frame a paper not merely as filling a knowledge gap, but as resolving a core theoretical tension or participating in a live, generalist debate. It is essential for improving submissions to highly selective, theory-driven journals like AJS.

The American Journal of Sociology (AJS) prizes theoretical ambition and general significance over subfield novelty. This guide provides a rigorous framework and a four-part test to help researchers pressure-test their ideas. It assesses whether a project engages with the broadest sociological debates, possesses a portable theoretical payoff, and is framed for the most appropriate academic venue (AJS vs. ASR).

This skill provides a comprehensive fit assessment and checklist for clinical research targeting The American Journal of Gastroenterology. It guides authors on required evidence levels, reporting standards (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), structuring the manuscript, and ensuring the study has clear, practice-relevant clinical implications for GI/Hepatology practitioners. It serves as a crucial pre-submission refinement aid.

A comprehensive guide for authors assessing the suitability of their clinical or translational oncology studies for Annals of Oncology (ESMO). It covers the journal's high standards for rigorous, practice-changing research, including requirements for robust trial design, biomarker validation, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), and alignment with ESMO best practices. This is a venue-fit aid, not medical or regulatory advice.

This guide helps researchers determine if an interesting phenomenon or trend constitutes a genuine theoretical puzzle suitable for the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It guides users to distinguish between a simple topic, an empirical test, and a deep theoretical contradiction that requires building new knowledge-based claims.