Skill UI

This skill provides comprehensive code review capabilities for analyzing git diffs or specific file scopes. It goes beyond simple syntax checks, assessing code for reuse opportunities, quality issues (e.g., redundant state, leaky abstractions), efficiency bottlenecks, and adherence to standards. It utilizes multiple specialized sub-agents (Reuse, Quality, Efficiency, Clarity) to perform parallel, read-only audits. Optionally, it can apply high-confidence, behavior-preserving fixes upon user request.

A comprehensive guide to Next.js 16+ and Turbopack. Learn how Turbopack, an incremental bundler written in Rust, significantly accelerates development server startup and Hot Module Replacement (HMR) using file system caching. This guide clarifies when to use Turbopack versus Webpack, and outlines best practices for optimizing production builds and debugging development performance.

This skill reviews a single Markdown troubleshooting note to assess its clarity and completeness. It is designed to identify unclear steps, missing prerequisites, or unverifiable claims within a provided note. Use it when a user asks for feedback to improve an existing troubleshooting document. It provides concise, actionable rewrite suggestions without making any external changes or edits.

A comprehensive guide detailing the unique commissioning process for submitting to Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych). It clarifies the difference between unsolicited submissions and invited roles, providing playbooks for both suggesting a new topic/author lineup and managing the scope and contributions once an invitation is secured. Essential reading for researchers aiming to publish in a commissioned volume.

This guide provides comprehensive principles for designing self-contained, accessible, and publication-ready tables and figures for the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It emphasizes fitting Cambridge's strict physical dimensions, adhering to word count limits, ensuring data reproducibility, and structuring exhibits for maximum clarity to a broad, expert readership.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers revise NLP research papers for top-tier conferences like EACL. It focuses on structuring the argument for fast legibility by emphasizing a clear Task-Gap-Method-Result-Scope arc, quantifying results with statistics, performing detailed error analysis, and maintaining academic rigor, anonymity, and multilingual clarity. Ideal for polishing conference submissions.

This guide outlines the specific expectations for preparing the 'artifact' when submitting papers to the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). It clarifies that ICDT is a pure theory venue, meaning the primary deliverable is not runnable code or system badges, but the complete, verifiable proof. Key components include the marked appendix (for review) and the consistent, archived full version on arXiv.

This comprehensive guide assists software engineers in determining the most appropriate venue (e.g., ICSME, ICSE, MSR) for their research paper. It clarifies the critical difference between general software engineering techniques and studies focused on the post-release lifecycle, such as maintenance, technical debt, program comprehension, and system evolution.

This guide details best practices for revising technical papers submitted to top AI conferences (e.g., IJCAI). It teaches authors how to structure their work to maximize clarity, emphasize broad AI significance, and ensure the paper is self-contained and accessible to a diverse, cross-disciplinary review committee.

This guide helps authors targeting top-tier conferences on Constraint Programming (CP) to strategically position their manuscripts. It provides deep insights into the required scope, evidence bar, technical focus (e.g., propagation, optimization), and necessary re-framing techniques. Use this skill to enhance algorithmic clarity and ensure your work aligns precisely with the specialized community standards of the venue.

This skill polishes academic medical manuscripts to conform to the rigorous standards of major medical journals, such as JAMA, following the AMA Manual of Style. It focuses on refining prose by removing excessive jargon, correcting instances of overstatement ('spin'), replacing casual or causal language with scientifically accurate associational terms, and ensuring adherence to precise statistical and linguistic guidelines for maximum clarity and impact.

A detailed guide for authors drafting responses, rebuttals, and discussions for major conferences like NeurIPS. It emphasizes adhering to strict double-blind constraints, focusing on technical evidence rather than arguing tone, and structuring responses to clarify misunderstandings and move reviewers toward an accurate decision.