Skill UI

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate top-tier academic conference (e.g., CoNEXT, SIGCOMM, NSDI, IMC) and submission cycle for their networking research. It provides detailed criteria, routing tables, and tests (e.g., platform-realism test, model-swap test) to ensure the contribution is evaluated on a real target and fits the target community's scope and rigor.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their manuscript is suitable for the Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) conference. It covers the specific scope fit, required evidence standards (including threat models and economic context), and best practices for re-framing general CS research into a finance/security-focused narrative, ensuring the paper meets the expectations of the specialized review community.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal academic venue for their software engineering work. It compares major conferences (FSE, ICSE, ASE, ISSTA) and journals, advising on contribution shape, evidence maturity, and community fit to maximize publication chances and fit the research into the correct academic community.

This guide helps researchers decide the most appropriate venue for their database theory research, comparing major conferences like ICDT, PODS, EDBT, and top journals (ACM TODS, LMCS). It provides detailed criteria, such as the required data-management consequence, the nature of the theorem, and strategies for choosing between competing flagship venues based on calendar, publisher, and community fit.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and positioning the novelty and eligibility of research submissions in the field of software maintenance and evolution. It teaches authors to write a 'delta-first' related work section, contrasting their contribution against key prior works and covering specialized literature lanes (e.g., MSR, ICSE, TSE) to demonstrate deep command of the academic community.

This skill guides authors on positioning their computer science manuscripts for the International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV). It provides a comprehensive framework for assessing conference fit, framing the contribution, strengthening evidence, and navigating the specific requirements (like formal correctness and tool benchmarks) of top-tier formal verification venues, ensuring submissions meet community expectations.

This guide helps authors targeting top-tier conferences on Constraint Programming (CP) to strategically position their manuscripts. It provides deep insights into the required scope, evidence bar, technical focus (e.g., propagation, optimization), and necessary re-framing techniques. Use this skill to enhance algorithmic clarity and ensure your work aligns precisely with the specialized community standards of the venue.

This guide helps researchers determine if their core contribution—a mobile or embedded system, application, or service running on a device—is best suited for the MobiSys conference. It provides detailed criteria for venue selection, distinguishing between contributions for MobiSys, MobiCom, SenSys, NSDI/OSDI, and other related top-tier venues, ensuring authors route their work to the most appropriate academic community.

This comprehensive guide assists reviewers and authors in determining the most appropriate venue for programming language research within the SIGPLAN community. It provides a detailed 'center-of-mass' test, helping categorize contributions based on whether they emphasize metatheory (POPL), performance engineering (PLDI), functional techniques (ICFCP), or the broad design scope characteristic of OOPSLA. It guides the decision-making process for academic submissions.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal venue (like POPL, PLDI, OOPSLA) for their academic papers on programming languages. It advises authors on whether their core contribution is theoretical (proofs, semantics), implementation-focused (compilers, benchmarks), or empirical (user studies), ensuring their work reaches the most appropriate specialized reviewer community.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for improving the reproducibility of academic network measurements and research artifacts, particularly for conferences like SIGCOMM. It details the necessary evidence map and the 'four ledgers'—topology, traffic, configuration, and run—to ensure that all reported claims can be accurately recreated and verified by the wider academic community.