Skill UI

Provides paragraph-level structural blueprints and venue-specific checklists for 10–12 page systems conference submissions (OSDI/SOSP/ASPLOS/NSDI/EuroSys), covering writing patterns, reviewer guidance, LaTeX templates, and deadline tracking.

Prepare journal papers, conference submissions, posters, and grant documents with venue-specific formatting guidance, official template checks, and LaTeX scaffolds for drafting and compliance review.

This skill orchestrates the constrained resubmission of a highly polished academic paper from one conference or workshop venue to another. It is designed for scenarios where the paper is finalized, and the goal is to absorb specific reviewer critiques (e.g., clarifying statements or minor edits) without introducing new experiments, changing the core bibliography, or restructuring the framework. It ensures the new submission is isolated in a sibling directory, preserving the integrity of prior submissions.

A comprehensive tool for authors targeting the ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS). It provides expert guidance on assessing whether a computer and communications security manuscript is a strong fit for this specific, high-impact venue. Topics covered include conference fit assessment, evidence bar establishment, manuscript re-framing strategies, threat modeling, and proper community positioning for maximum review impact.

This skill guides authors and researchers on how to strategically position their computer graphics, rendering, or visual computing work for the ACM SIGGRAPH conference. It covers core fit assessment, required evidence (visual, mathematical, or system), manuscript reframing from journal/arXiv styles, and navigating venue-specific submission requirements. Use this tool to improve your conference submission strategy and maximize visibility among top graphics reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the ACM SIGIR conference on Information Retrieval. This skill helps determine the venue fit, structure the manuscript narrative, and ensure the research meets the high standards expected by top-tier IR reviewers. It covers core topics like search, ranking, recommendation, and the necessary evidence bar (e.g., strong baselines, test collections) for successful submission.

This comprehensive guide helps authors position and structure systems-focused manuscripts for top-tier conferences like SOSP. It covers defining the core contribution (abstraction, architecture, mechanism), optimizing the narrative for systems reviewers, and strengthening the empirical evidence bar in operating systems and distributed computing.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire end-to-end workflow for submitting and presenting at ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It breaks down the complex process into distinct phases—from initial thematic scoping and track selection, through the OpenReview abstract submission, paper and supplement delivery, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready preparation, and final conference presentation. It provides actionable advice, risk mitigation strategies, and re-targeting options for both success and rejection.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for authors revising technical papers for top AI/Statistics conferences like AISTATS. It emphasizes achieving statistical rigor, explicitly stating assumptions, pairing every claim with proof or evidence, ensuring conciseness (e.g., adhering to an 8-page limit), and maintaining double-blind academic style. Perfect for PhD students or researchers preparing manuscripts for highly technical review.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to IEEE/ACM ASE conferences. It covers strict formatting rules (acmart template, page budget), mandatory Data Availability Statements, double-anonymous review compliance, and critical submission pitfalls like identity leaks and template errors. Use this checklist before uploading to HotCRP to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide outlines the critical rules for structuring technical research papers submitted to top-tier conferences like ASE. It emphasizes the 'decision-criticality' rule, instructing authors on how to separate core arguments (which must fit within the 10-page body) from reproduction details, raw logs, and supplementary material (the artifact). Mastering this separation is crucial for ensuring reviewers judge the paper on its merits, not its supplementary data.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.