Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire end-to-end workflow for submitting and presenting at ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It breaks down the complex process into distinct phases—from initial thematic scoping and track selection, through the OpenReview abstract submission, paper and supplement delivery, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready preparation, and final conference presentation. It provides actionable advice, risk mitigation strategies, and re-targeting options for both success and rejection.

Provides comprehensive guidance for researchers deciding the optimal conference venue for Software Engineering (SE) research. It distinguishes between contributions that focus on *automation* (techniques or tools that automate SE tasks) suitable for ASE, versus those that are broad empirical findings, theoretical results, or pure ML advances, directing them to venues like ICSE, FSE, or ISSTA.

A comprehensive, step-by-step guide for researchers planning and executing a submission to the ASE (Automated Software Engineering) conference. Covers the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and evidence gathering (reproducibility) to abstract registration, double-anonymous submission, navigating the early-rejection gate, rebuttal, criteria-bound revision, and final camera-ready artifact submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine the optimal venue for their computer systems paper. It teaches the critical differences between broad, practical conferences (like ATC) and selective, specialized venues (like OSDI, SOSP, or NSDI). The guide helps authors assess whether their work is novel, useful, focused on deployed experience, or requires specific networking/storage expertise.

This guide helps researchers strategically determine the best academic venue (e.g., CAV, TACAS, FMCAD) and paper category (Regular, Tool, Application, Industrial) for their formal methods research. It provides detailed criteria for classifying contributions based on guaranteed techniques, usable tools, or real-world case studies, ensuring maximum impact and fit for the target conference.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in determining the optimal top-tier academic venue (such as CCS, S&P, USENIX, NDSS, PETS) for their security research. It teaches how to rigorously classify the security contribution type, sharpen the threat model, and assess the technical fit of the work based on its nature (attack, defense, protocol, etc.).

This guide teaches authors how to strategically position their human-computer interaction (HCI) research for top-tier conferences like CHI. It covers identifying the core contribution type (e.g., theory, empirical study, system artifact), determining the most suitable venue (e.g., UIST, CSCW, DIS), and selecting the appropriate reviewing subcommittees to maximize acceptance chances and impact.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate top-tier academic conference (e.g., CoNEXT, SIGCOMM, NSDI, IMC) and submission cycle for their networking research. It provides detailed criteria, routing tables, and tests (e.g., platform-realism test, model-swap test) to ensure the contribution is evaluated on a real target and fits the target community's scope and rigor.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal venue for their database project, analyzing whether the work belongs at EDBT, SIGMOD, VLDB, ICDE, or a dedicated theory venue like ICDT. It provides frameworks for choosing the right conference based on contribution type (systems, theory, experiments), open access preferences, and submission cycle proximity.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding the optimal conference venue (e.g., FAST, OSDI, NSDI, ATC) for their storage-related academic work. It advises on distinguishing a core storage contribution from general systems results, detailing specific contribution shapes FAST rewards, and providing routing logic based on the project's nature and evidence maturity.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal academic venue for their software engineering work. It compares major conferences (FSE, ICSE, ASE, ISSTA) and journals, advising on contribution shape, evidence maturity, and community fit to maximize publication chances and fit the research into the correct academic community.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate conference venue (e.g., HPCA, ISCA, MICRO, ASPLOS) for their microarchitecture or systems research paper. It outlines key criteria, such as whether the contribution is a measured microarchitectural cost, a buildable mechanism, or a measurable characterization, and how to strategically route the project based on its novelty and evidence.