Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps required to prepare a camera-ready version of an NLP conference paper (e.g., EACL). It covers mandatory submissions after acceptance, including content expansion, de-anonymization (restoring author names, citations, and metadata), addressing meta-review required changes, ensuring correct ACL Anthology metadata, and managing public artifact release and presentation logistics. Essential for ensuring academic integrity and compliance.

This guide provides expert advice on structuring academic research papers, specifically tailored for EACL submissions. It details the optimal placement of core arguments, limitations, findings, and supplemental code across the content body, appendices, and supplementary archives, ensuring that decision-critical information is always visible to reviewers.

This central routing skill guides authors through the complex process of journal selection for engineering and technology manuscripts. It does not replace a single journal submission but first classifies the content based on the engineering sub-discipline, contribution type (e.g., method, system, device), validation shape (e.g., simulation, field experiment), and intended audience breadth. It then routes the paper to the most specialized and appropriate journal skill for accurate re-framing and submission.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for preparing Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscripts. It guides users through the complex submission pipeline by determining the optimal article type (e.g., Research Article, Critical Review, Policy Analysis) and the current stage of writing, ensuring the content maintains clear environmental significance. It routes users to specific sub-skills like data analysis, literature positioning, and writing style.

This guide details the comprehensive process of transforming a reviewed, double-blind academic paper into a final, IEEE-published camera-ready manuscript and a conference talk. It covers crucial steps including de-anonymization, applying the official IEEE template and rights forms, integrating reproducibility badges, confirming DOIs, and structuring the presentation content for the winter slot.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting technical papers to conferences like ICASSP. It teaches how to manage extensive supplementary materials—including derivations, extra results, and multimedia—while ensuring the core 4-page paper remains self-contained and review-ready under single-blind review constraints. Focus on core claims, not volume.

A comprehensive guide for authors converting an accepted research paper into its final, published camera-ready form. This checklist covers critical steps including de-anonymization, restoring author metadata (ORCIDs, DOIs), strategically utilizing extra page content, and ensuring strict production quality (IEEE templates, references, and availability statements) required for major academic proceedings.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to major academic conferences (e.g., ICSE). It details the strict rules for differentiating mandatory core content (the 10-page limit) from supporting evidence, such as extended proofs, scripts, and raw data, which must be placed in an anonymized supplementary package. Learn the 'summarize-and-point' discipline to ensure verifiability and maintain reviewer trust.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

This guide provides a crucial late-stage polish for economic manuscripts targeting rigorous, broad-audience journals like the International Economic Review (IER). It focuses on elevating prose, structuring the introduction (four-move approach), and ensuring formal precision while maintaining cross-field legibility. Use this when your content is strong, but the narrative structure or academic writing voice needs sharpening to successfully communicate complex results to diverse referees.

This guide details the crucial rules for structuring a scientific paper submitted to conferences like ITCS. It dictates how content—including main theorems, proofs, and motivation—must be distributed across three locations: the main body, the submitted appendix, and the external full version (arXiv). The core principle ensures that all decision-critical evidence for accepting the paper resides within the submitted PDF, preventing reviewers from relying on external or unread preprints.