Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing an artifact appendix (ae.tex) for major conferences like ASPLOS. Learn how to structure your submission to achieve Available, Functional, and Reproducible badges. Covers managing complex dependencies (hardware, software, data), structuring the repository for evaluators, and optimizing collaboration protocols to ensure successful post-acceptance validation.

This guide provides comprehensive principles for designing self-contained, accessible, and publication-ready tables and figures for the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It emphasizes fitting Cambridge's strict physical dimensions, adhering to word count limits, ensuring data reproducibility, and structuring exhibits for maximum clarity to a broad, expert readership.

This guide outlines best practices for structuring academic papers submitted via OpenReview, particularly for venues like ICLR. It advises authors on where to place different types of evidence—such as core claims, full derivations, code, and large datasets—to ensure the central argument remains visible while maintaining academic rigor. It covers strategies for managing annexes, maintaining anonymity, and updating revisions.

A comprehensive guide for positioning highly technical research in top-tier academic venues like ISCA. It instructs authors on deep literature surveying across multiple databases (ACM, IEEE, dblp, arXiv), structuring the 'related work' section using structural differentiation (mechanism delta), and adhering to double-blind review guidelines. Essential for advanced technical paper writing.

This skill guides authors through the rigorous, multi-stage submission process for the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA). It acts as a detailed router, providing the necessary next steps—from topic selection and identifying credible design (DID, IV, RDD) to structuring the contribution, managing data archives, and preparing the rebuttal. It ensures manuscripts meet the high quantitative and academic standards required by this top-tier finance journal.

This guide helps authors structure the Related Work section for top-tier academic journals like the Journal of Software. It focuses on demonstrating incremental contribution (delta-first positioning), structuring the review across multiple software disciplines (e.g., SE, Systems, Databases), ensuring balanced citations (international vs. domestic), and building comprehensive classification frameworks for review papers.

This guide provides a sophisticated framework for structuring the related work section when submitting research to KDD. It instructs authors on how to position their work within the deep academic lineage of data mining, comparing their novelty not just to prior KDD volumes, but also to major ML flagships (ICML, NeurIPS) and specialized venues (WWW, ICDM). Learn to articulate mechanism-level differences and avoid common citation traps.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to manage the division of content between the core 7-page paper body and the supplemental materials package for SIGGRAPH submissions. It emphasizes treating the results video as primary evidence, providing best practices for video creation, comparison galleries, and organizing additional technical evidence (code, data, proofs).

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for creating and submitting supplementary materials for top-tier academic conferences. It addresses the critical challenges of maintaining strict anonymity, adhering to page limits, and structuring extended proofs, code links, and datasets across multi-round, double-anonymous review cycles.

This guide provides best practices for authors submitting to top-tier technical conferences. It clarifies the critical distinction between core, review-essential arguments (which must stand alone in the main paper) and supporting evidence (such as formal proofs, extra data analyses, or methodological details) suitable for an optional supplementary document. It also covers anonymity best practices and distinguishing between different submission types.

This guide details the structured process for drafting a comprehensive response and rebuttal letter after a The Accounting Review (TAR) revise-and-resubmit cycle. It covers how to address point-by-point reviewer comments, reconcile conflicting demands, and address key methodological concerns like identification, contribution, and data authenticity, ensuring the revised submission is professional and robust.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting The Astrophysical Journal (ApJ) or its Letters companion (ApJL). It helps determine manuscript fit, ensures methodological rigor, and outlines house style requirements, covering everything from data availability and systematic uncertainty analysis to article length limitations. This tool assists in structuring high-quality, archival-grade astrophysics research papers.