Skill UI

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final pre-submission review for the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM). It ensures the manuscript is properly anonymized (double-blind), confirms adherence to membership/fee requirements, and verifies all necessary metadata, data availability statements, and formatting standards before upload to the Wiley Research Exchange platform.

Performs a comprehensive security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementations, including servers, clients, and tools. This skill reviews code against critical security baselines (MCP-01 to MCP-05), OWASP MCP Top 10, and common Remote Code Execution (RCE) vectors (e.g., command injection, deserialization, SSRF). The output provides a detailed report with file and line references, ensuring compliance and identifying vulnerabilities before release. Use this when auditing network-exposed services or client security posture.

This comprehensive guide assists reviewers and authors in determining the most appropriate venue for programming language research within the SIGPLAN community. It provides a detailed 'center-of-mass' test, helping categorize contributions based on whether they emphasize metatheory (POPL), performance engineering (PLDI), functional techniques (ICFCP), or the broad design scope characteristic of OOPSLA. It guides the decision-making process for academic submissions.

A comprehensive late-stage review pass designed for academic manuscripts targeting Organization Science. This skill ensures the paper effectively front-loads the core argument and contribution, translating complex ideas for an interdisciplinary, micro-to-macro audience. It enforces strict adherence to INFORMS house style, structural rigor, and cross-level consistency.

This guide provides strict guidelines for authors writing the "Related Work" section for top-tier programming language theory conferences like POPL. It emphasizes moving beyond general literature reviews to pinpoint precise, technical "delta sentences" that prove novelty against neighboring formal systems. It covers citation standards, venue mapping, and attribution verification for maximum academic impact.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous standards required for submitting parallel programming research to top-tier academic venues. It covers crucial topics such as proving concurrency correctness, demonstrating measurable scalability using speedup curves, adhering to strict formatting (10 pages, two-column layout), and structuring the technical contribution to satisfy expert reviewers.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of submitting a manuscript to Physical Review Letters (PRL). It verifies critical elements including LaTeX formatting (REVTeX), article type, required supplemental material, detailed metadata, author compliance, and adherence to APS guidelines. Use this checklist as the ultimate gate before final submission to prevent common desk-return triggers.

This comprehensive guide acts as a router for writing a theoretical or formal-model manuscript for a Psychological Review submission. It guides the user through the entire lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theory construction to argument development, boundary setting, and final submission readiness. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the correct subsequent step.

This comprehensive guide outlines the structured process for authors responding to peer review feedback for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., SIGCOMM). It critically distinguishes between drafting a concise, decision-focused rebuttal and executing a formal, contract-bound one-shot revision. It provides strict guidelines on building the required submission packet, including point-by-point responses, change-marked manuscripts, and evidence anchoring, ensuring submissions meet high academic standards.

This guide details the critical steps and changes required to transform a reviewed SIGIR submission into the final Version of Record published via ACM Digital Library. It covers technical requirements, metadata standardization (CCS, keywords), conflict resolution, and adhering to publishing timelines and copyright protocols (e-rights, TAPS).

This guide outlines the critical process of transforming an accepted academic submission into a final, camera-ready version for major conferences. It covers working effectively with a designated shepherd, managing strict page limits (13-14 pages), safely de-anonymizing the work, incorporating reviewer feedback, and adhering to strict ACM publication mechanics. It ensures the paper meets all professional standards for publication.

A comprehensive guide for writing the evaluation section of a systems paper for top-tier conferences. It teaches authors how to map every technical claim to verifiable experiments, establish fair state-of-the-art baselines, utilize mixed workloads (microbenchmarks, E2E applications, and traces), and honestly report critical metrics like performance tails, variance, and overheads. The goal is to maximize credibility and withstand rigorous peer review.