Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ASPLOS, a premier conference at the intersection of programming languages, operating systems, and computer architecture. This tool assists in positioning cross-layer evidence, framing the contribution, and ensuring the manuscript meets the strict technical and academic standards required for top-tier systems research.

This guide serves as a specialized workflow router for authors writing invited review articles for the Annual Review of Economics (ARE). It maps the entire lifecycle, from initial topic selection and proposal framing to systematic literature synthesis, framework imposition, evidence appraisal, and final revision, ensuring the resulting article is authoritative and comprehensive.

This comprehensive preflight checklist is designed for authors submitting a commissioned review article to Annual Reviews of Psychology (ARPsych). It guides users through critical compliance checks, ensuring adherence to assigned length, proper reference formatting, securing figure permissions, completing conflict-of-interest disclosures, and verifying the transparency and reproducibility of any embedded meta-analysis or literature search. It serves as the final quality assurance step before formal publishing submission.

This guide serves as a comprehensive router for authors preparing an invited review article for the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych). It outlines the systematic, multi-stage process, guiding authors through topic selection, literature synthesis, framework development, writing style refinement, and final submission/revision, ensuring the final piece is authoritative and comprehensive.

This workflow guides the entire process of writing an authoritative, invited review article for the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc). It systematically routes the author through the academic lifecycle, covering stages from topic selection and systematic literature synthesis to imposing an organizing framework and final revision, ensuring the output is a comprehensive analytical map of a subfield.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic research tools and data into highly polished, reproducible, and reusable packages for the ASE Artifact Evaluation track. Learn how to meet the criteria for earning 'Artifacts Available' (DOI archiving) and 'Artifacts Reusable' badges, ensuring your work is durable and accessible to the wider research community.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to IEEE/ACM ASE conferences. It covers strict formatting rules (acmart template, page budget), mandatory Data Availability Statements, double-anonymous review compliance, and critical submission pitfalls like identity leaks and template errors. Use this checklist before uploading to HotCRP to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide outlines the critical rules for structuring technical research papers submitted to top-tier conferences like ASE. It emphasizes the 'decision-criticality' rule, instructing authors on how to separate core arguments (which must fit within the 10-page body) from reproduction details, raw logs, and supplementary material (the artifact). Mastering this separation is crucial for ensuring reviewers judge the paper on its merits, not its supplementary data.

This guide details best practices for ensuring scientific rigor and reproducibility in complex system research. It outlines the necessity of capturing the full execution state—including hardware steppings, BIOS revisions, kernel configurations, toolchain versions, and dataset provenance—to prevent data decay and validate findings against environmental drift.

A comprehensive audit guide for the final pre-upload stage of major academic conference submissions (e.g., ASPLOS). This tool ensures compliance across critical areas, including strict 11-page limits, mandatory LaTeX templates, correct full-name citation formatting, hyperlinked DOIs, double-blind anonymity, and accurate HotCRP form completion.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

This guide helps researchers structure and articulate the core theoretical contribution of their academic manuscripts, particularly for high-standard journals like ASQ. It teaches the critical difference between simply reporting findings and making a fundamental theoretical advancement. Learn how to frame contributions using mechanisms, reframing, boundary conditions, and integration, optimizing your Introduction and Discussion sections to maximize impact.