Skill UI

A critical pre-submission tool that provides a comprehensive go/no-go scorecard for academic manuscripts. It evaluates nine dimensions—including fit, robustness, and venue mechanics—to catch avoidable desk-reject risks before the author submits the paper. It scores the manuscript against the target venue's specific requirements and provides actionable feedback on gaps and necessary revisions.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for improving the reproducibility of academic network measurements and research artifacts, particularly for conferences like SIGCOMM. It details the necessary evidence map and the 'four ledgers'—topology, traffic, configuration, and run—to ensure that all reported claims can be accurately recreated and verified by the wider academic community.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding if their networking contribution (mechanism, architecture, or protocol) is a strong fit for SIGCOMM. It provides criteria for distinguishing between research novelty and real-world experience, and routes the work to similar top venues like NSDI, MobiCom, and IMC based on the core technical signal.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a SIGGRAPH paper for final publication in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). It details the rigorous requirements beyond simple revisions, covering essential journal metadata (DOI, ACM rights, CCS concepts), correct formatting, permanent archiving of code/data, and finalizing supplemental media for professional publication.

A comprehensive guide for computer graphics researchers detailing how to achieve result-level reproducibility, especially for major conferences like SIGGRAPH. It emphasizes pinning all provenance—including assets, random seeds, hardware stacks, and hyperparameters—and methodologies for handling non-determinism in floating-point math and stochastic simulations, ensuring that the reported figures and timings can be regenerated by any reader.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to manage the division of content between the core 7-page paper body and the supplemental materials package for SIGGRAPH submissions. It emphasizes treating the results video as primary evidence, providing best practices for video creation, comparison galleries, and organizing additional technical evidence (code, data, proofs).

This skill assists researchers in strategically positioning their computer graphics and visualization research. It evaluates whether a contribution is truly "graphics-shaped" (demanding visual results and advancing graphics axes) and recommends the optimal venue (e.g., SIGGRAPH, CVPR, CHI, EGSR) and submission track (Dual-track or Journal-only) based on the nature and maturity of the work. It provides a crucial, high-leverage decision framework before committing to a submission.

This comprehensive guide provides the optimal structure and academic writing discipline for submitting high-quality technical papers to major computer graphics conferences, such as SIGGRAPH. It emphasizes building a compelling 'first-page arc,' leveraging the teaser figure to immediately demonstrate results, maintaining academic honesty by detailing limitations, and adhering to strict page budget constraints.

This guide details the critical steps and changes required to transform a reviewed SIGIR submission into the final Version of Record published via ACM Digital Library. It covers technical requirements, metadata standardization (CCS, keywords), conflict resolution, and adhering to publishing timelines and copyright protocols (e-rights, TAPS).

A comprehensive guide for packaging and evaluating research artifacts for academic conferences like SIGMETRICS. It details the requirements for achieving ACM Badges (Functional, Reusable, Reproduced) by ensuring the packaged simulation can regenerate key figures and results on a clean machine, moving beyond mere tool execution.

Provides strict guidelines for structuring and partitioning academic papers submitted to SIGMETRICS. It details the proper placement of content, specifying what must reside in the main body (decision-critical claims like theorems and assumptions), what belongs in the appendices (full proofs, extended analysis), and what constitutes the anonymized artifact. Adherence ensures the core argument is reviewable solely from the primary reviewed pages.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for creating and submitting supplementary materials for top-tier academic conferences. It addresses the critical challenges of maintaining strict anonymity, adhering to page limits, and structuring extended proofs, code links, and datasets across multi-round, double-anonymous review cycles.