Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous standards required for achieving experimental reproducibility in systems research papers (e.g., VLDB). It instructs authors on disclosing critical context, including hardware specifications, software configurations, data provenance, workload patterns, and handling measurement variance. Adhering to these guidelines ensures that all performance claims are fully traceable from raw data to published figures, meeting the highest standards of academic review.

A detailed guide for revising academic papers, specifically tailored for systems and database conferences like VLDB. It emphasizes establishing a strong 'page-one contract,' quantifying all performance claims with scoped metrics and baselines, and maintaining rigorous candor regarding design trade-offs and terminology throughout the manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to WACV, detailing the strategic differences between the optional one-page Round 1 rebuttal and the mandatory change summary accompanying a Revise-and-Resubmit. It provides best practices for addressing reviewer concerns, maintaining anonymity, and accurately documenting revisions.

This comprehensive guide provides researchers with structured methodologies for designing and auditing Computer Vision (CV) experiments for major conferences like WACV. It details the critical differences between the Applications and Algorithms tracks, emphasizing the need to report performance under real deployment constraints (e.g., power, latency) and ensuring fair, rigorous comparisons with baselines. Ideal for revising submissions to meet high review standards.

A comprehensive audit guide for authors submitting to WACV. It covers critical submission decisions, including choosing between Round 1 or Round 2, selecting the appropriate Applications or Algorithms track, adhering to the 8-page limit, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and ensuring all coauthors have valid OpenReview profiles to prevent desk rejection.

Comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end academic submission workflow for the WACV conference. This specialized workflow accounts for the two-round submission model, including key branching points like Round 1 reviews, optional rebuttals, Revise-and-Resubmit stages, Round 2 revisions, and final camera-ready preparation, which single-deadline plans often miss.

A comprehensive guide to structuring and writing academic papers for WACV, focusing on maximizing acceptance rates. It details the critical differences between writing for 'Applications' vs. 'Algorithms' tracks, ensuring the first page immediately captures reviewer attention. Key advice includes adhering to the strict 8-page budget, making figures self-contained, scoping all claims precisely, and moving excessive detail to supplements.

A comprehensive strategy guide for submitting academic papers to The World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It teaches researchers how to anticipate and preempt common criticisms from development-economics referees (identification flaws, policy relevance, data quality) and how to structure the cover letter to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide provides a structured framework for conducting and presenting robust checks in econometric manuscripts, particularly relevant for studies using developing-country data. It moves beyond simple appendix dumping by organizing tests around potential identification threats and specific data-quality risks (e.g., measurement error, coverage gaps). It helps ensure the core findings are load-bearing against sophisticated academic scrutiny.

A comprehensive guide detailing when and how to structure theoretical models in development economics research, particularly for World Bank Economic Review submissions. It emphasizes that models must serve a functional purpose—such as interpreting empirical coefficients, running policy counterfactuals, or aggregating to welfare statements—rather than being decorative. Key principles cover parameter identification, matching structural frictions to the local setting, and handling counterfactual assumptions (Lucas critique).

A detailed guide for structuring and positioning development economics research for high-impact journals like The World Bank Economic Review (WBER). It teaches researchers to reframe their work to satisfy two crucial criteria: rigorous empirical design (credible empirics) and actionable policy relevance in developing countries, ensuring the work transcends being a mere project report.

This comprehensive guide details the strategic process of writing a high-impact rebuttal for major academic conferences. It teaches users how to triage mixed reviewer feedback, differentiate between in-track, adjacent-track, and web-fit objections, and structure responses using concrete evidence, specific citations, and confident concessions to maximize the paper's acceptance chances.