Skill UI

Guides research teams through a two-stage manuscript workflow: outline sections with research-lookup, enforce IMRAD structure, citation styles, figures, and reporting guidelines, then convert into polished prose for journals.

Generates a structured paper outline from review conclusions and experiment results. Supports multiple venues (ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, etc.), optional style reference from a source paper, and produces a gap report. Ideal for researchers planning papers before writing.

This tool generates a complete, publication-quality LaTeX fragment for a specific section of a research paper (e.g., Introduction, Method, Results). It strictly adheres to provided writing plans, structural conventions, citation budgets, and overall paper narratives, ensuring the output is ready for direct compilation and seamless integration into a full document.

A comprehensive guide for revising complex multi-agent research papers for top-tier conferences. It emphasizes an 'interaction-first' approach, ensuring the unique contribution is highlighted on the first page. The guide mandates naming solution concepts, making the game legible, and rigorously pairing every major claim with a formal proof, self-play, or deployment experiment.

This skill guides authors writing about programming languages, software systems, and PL applications on how to assess if their manuscript is a suitable fit for the OOPSLA conference. It provides strategies for reframing papers, defining the required evidence (empirical, formal, or tool-based), and positioning the work against established CS research standards for top-tier systems conferences.

This skill acts as a central workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy (AEJ: Policy). It diagnoses the current stage of a paper—whether it's topic selection, design, modeling, writing, or rebuttal—and recommends the next specialized skill. It ensures the research maintains a strong focus on credible causal evidence and actionable policy implications.

This guide provides comprehensive rules for authors revising technical papers for top AI/Statistics conferences like AISTATS. It emphasizes achieving statistical rigor, explicitly stating assumptions, pairing every claim with proof or evidence, ensuring conciseness (e.g., adhering to an 8-page limit), and maintaining double-blind academic style. Perfect for PhD students or researchers preparing manuscripts for highly technical review.

This is the comprehensive orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the correct submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) and ensuring critical steps, such as mandatory third-party code verification, are integrated from the start. It dispatches to specific sub-skills rather than drafting content.

A detailed guide for authors writing the Related Work section of an Automated Software Engineering (ASE) paper. It teaches the crucial 'delta argument' methodology, emphasizing that positioning must be against prior automated tools, covering multiple SE literature lanes, and conducting fair, head-to-head empirical comparisons to clearly delineate the novelty of the proposed work.

A comprehensive guide to meeting the rigorous reporting standards required for high-impact scientific journals (e.g., Cell Press). It details the structure of STAR Methods, mandates the creation of a Key Resources Table (KRT), and outlines necessary authentication for cell lines, antibodies, animal models, and deposited data (including specific identifiers like RRIDs, GEO/PRIDE accessions). This ensures maximum transparency and reproducibility in scientific research writing.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier security conferences like CCS. It provides rigorous rules on establishing explicit threat models, quantifying security claims with measurable evidence, structuring the core technical argument, and effectively compressing complex research into limited page limits. Essential for academic publication in the field of cybersecurity.

This guide teaches advanced techniques for writing literature reviews in top-tier economics journals. The core principle is moving beyond simply listing past work; instead, you must precisely position your contribution by defining the delta (difference) relative to specific, foundational academic papers. Learn to articulate your unique value by highlighting improved identification strategies, clearer mechanisms, or novel parameters.