Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to a high-level Computer Science journal. It covers all critical aspects of academic formatting, including reportive abstracts (4 elements), proper citation styles (GB/T 7714-2015), figure/table standards, nomenclature, and general academic style, ensuring manuscripts pass initial editorial review.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers revise NLP research papers for top-tier conferences like EACL. It focuses on structuring the argument for fast legibility by emphasizing a clear Task-Gap-Method-Result-Scope arc, quantifying results with statistics, performing detailed error analysis, and maintaining academic rigor, anonymity, and multilingual clarity. Ideal for polishing conference submissions.

A specialized guide for polishing academic manuscripts, particularly in econometrics and theoretical sciences. It enforces a terse, formal, and highly structured writing style, ensuring all definitions, assumptions, and theorems are numbered and displayed correctly. Ideal for turning narrative drafts into submissions suitable for top-tier academic journals.

This guide provides stringent best practices for authors submitting papers to top database systems conferences (like EDBT). It emphasizes leading with a concrete data-management contribution, ensuring mechanisms are reproducible in prose, and pairing every claim with rigorous, real-world evidence. It also dictates how to manage scope and adhere to publishing constraints.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for preparing Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscripts. It guides users through the complex submission pipeline by determining the optimal article type (e.g., Research Article, Critical Review, Policy Analysis) and the current stage of writing, ensuring the content maintains clear environmental significance. It routes users to specific sub-skills like data analysis, literature positioning, and writing style.

This skill provides a comprehensive fit and formatting guide for submitting high-impact clinical and surgical research to European Urology. It assesses the study's required evidence level, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and alignment with EAU/Elsevier house style. It is a vital aid for authors needing to re-frame their work for optimal journal acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting storage-related research to top-tier conferences (e.g., USENIX FAST). It dictates how to structure the paper, emphasizing leading with the specific storage cost addressed (e.g., write amplification, tail latency, endurance) and grounding all claims in proportional, real-device evidence rather than generic performance statements. Essential for ensuring technical rigor and reviewer trust.

A comprehensive guide for revising empirical papers submitted to top-tier Software Engineering conferences (like FSE). This framework emphasizes structuring the paper around a clear SE contribution, treating research questions as contracts, backing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously arguing threats to validity, rather than merely listing them. It ensures the paper maintains maximum academic rigor and focus.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

This guide provides stringent rules and structural advice for authors tackling academic papers, particularly in the domain of software maintenance and evolution. It emphasizes leading with the maintenance problem, stating research questions as contractual measurements, pairing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously discussing threats to validity. Use this when revising academic submissions to ensure maximum impact and technical rigor for the field.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). This skill helps assess venue fit, re-frame manuscripts from journal/arXiv styles, and structure papers for top CS conferences. It details required evidence (system architecture, realistic workloads) and best practices for positioning contributions in data engineering, database systems, and analytics.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.