Skill UI

This guide outlines the critical rules for structuring technical research papers submitted to top-tier conferences like ASE. It emphasizes the 'decision-criticality' rule, instructing authors on how to separate core arguments (which must fit within the 10-page body) from reproduction details, raw logs, and supplementary material (the artifact). Mastering this separation is crucial for ensuring reviewers judge the paper on its merits, not its supplementary data.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

This guide outlines best practices for designing and executing Computer Aided Verification (CAV) empirical evaluations. It emphasizes ensuring evidence matches claims by using standard, pinned benchmark sets, selecting fair baselines, respecting equal resource limits, and employing rigorous reporting methods like cactus and scatter plots to establish technical soundness and performance.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors on how to accurately position their research novelty within the complex landscape of formal verification techniques, tools, and academic literature. It emphasizes shifting from a simple citation catalog to a 'delta-first' contrast, clearly articulating technical differences, crediting specific tool and benchmark lineages, and understanding the scope of related venues (e.g., CAV, TACAS, FMCAD).

This guide details the comprehensive workflow for preparing an accepted ACM CCS paper for the final proceedings. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization, applying ACM sigconf templates and rights forms, incorporating shepherd/minor-revision feedback, placing artifact evaluation badges, and coordinating publication disclosure timing. Adherence to these technical and policy checks ensures compliance with ACM standards.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in determining the optimal top-tier academic venue (such as CCS, S&P, USENIX, NDSS, PETS) for their security research. It teaches how to rigorously classify the security contribution type, sharpen the threat model, and assess the technical fit of the work based on its nature (attack, defense, protocol, etc.).

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier security conferences like CCS. It provides rigorous rules on establishing explicit threat models, quantifying security claims with measurable evidence, structuring the core technical argument, and effectively compressing complex research into limited page limits. Essential for academic publication in the field of cybersecurity.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors on designing high-quality, ethically sound, and publication-ready exhibits for anthropology manuscripts. It covers technical requirements (file formats, figure caps), ethical obligations (consent, heritage rights, dignity), and scholarly presentation principles, ensuring exhibits strengthen the argument and withstand peer scrutiny.

A specialized skill for positioning computer graphics manuscripts for the Eurographics conference. It guides authors on framing their contribution, structuring technical evidence, and aligning the work with specialized European graphics research themes (e.g., rendering, visualization, geometry processing) to maximize acceptance chances and ensure precise scholarly focus.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to position novelty within top-tier systems literature (like EuroSys, SOSP, OSDI). It teaches authors to move beyond superficial citations by defining concrete 'technical deltas,' systematically covering neighboring research venues, and structuring the argument based on problem dimensions rather than chronology. Essential for ensuring rigorous academic positioning.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting storage-related research to top-tier conferences (e.g., USENIX FAST). It dictates how to structure the paper, emphasizing leading with the specific storage cost addressed (e.g., write amplification, tail latency, endurance) and grounding all claims in proportional, real-device evidence rather than generic performance statements. Essential for ensuring technical rigor and reviewer trust.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting technical papers to conferences like ICASSP. It teaches how to manage extensive supplementary materials—including derivations, extra results, and multimedia—while ensuring the core 4-page paper remains self-contained and review-ready under single-blind review constraints. Focus on core claims, not volume.