Skill UI

A guide for security researchers focused on finding exploitable, remote-reachable vulnerabilities for bug bounties or responsible disclosure. It emphasizes high-signal flaws such as SSRF, RCE, and SQL injection, while guiding users through the professional triage and PoC creation process for penetration testing.

Provides a structured, multi-step workflow for addressing and fixing GitHub issues. This skill guides the user through the entire development lifecycle: understanding the bug, researching context, planning changes, implementing code, rigorous testing, and finally submitting a polished Pull Request using GitHub CLI commands.

This skill serves as a specialized guide for authors submitting computer science manuscripts to ACM SIGMETRICS. It helps users assess the fit of their research, particularly those involving performance measurement, queueing theory, or system modeling. It provides detailed strategies on reframing the core contribution, defining the evidence bar, and positioning the work optimally for a highly selective conference.

This is the comprehensive orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the correct submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) and ensuring critical steps, such as mandatory third-party code verification, are integrated from the start. It dispatches to specific sub-skills rather than drafting content.

This guide helps researchers determine if an interesting phenomenon or trend constitutes a genuine theoretical puzzle suitable for the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It guides users to distinguish between a simple topic, an empirical test, and a deep theoretical contradiction that requires building new knowledge-based claims.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for manuscripts aiming for publication in China Soft Science, an authoritative journal focused on soft science, technology policy, and national innovation strategy. It helps users assess if their research depth, policy implication, and evidence base meet the journal's high academic standards, and outlines common pitfalls and appropriate revision strategies.

This skill provides a comprehensive pre-submission checklist for determining if a computer science research topic is suitable for a major journal, such as the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It guides users on assessing topic coherence, originality increment, manuscript type selection, and differentiating between various specialized journals, ensuring submissions meet high academic standards.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for researchers to evaluate whether their cognitive science project is suitable for high-impact, theory-driven journals. It guides users to elevate their contribution from single-effect reports to multi-experiment programs, formal computational models, and substantial theoretical advances, ensuring the work meets the necessary standard of integrative scope.

A comprehensive guide for positioning econometric research papers for submission to The Econometrics Journal (EctJ). It emphasizes making the novelty legible to both econometricians and applied users by focusing on a leading-case contribution within a stringent 20-page limit. Techniques include defining the 'Frontier layer' and 'Use layer' of related work, and placing citations strategically to maximize impact and demonstrate a sharp, applied delta.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for preparing Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscripts. It guides users through the complex submission pipeline by determining the optimal article type (e.g., Research Article, Critical Review, Policy Analysis) and the current stage of writing, ensuring the content maintains clear environmental significance. It routes users to specific sub-skills like data analysis, literature positioning, and writing style.

A framework for transforming empirical findings into portable, testable theoretical arguments, especially for comparative and longitudinal social science research. It guides the user to structure a macro–micro mechanism (e.g., how an institution influences individual choices) and derive cross-level hypotheses, ensuring the argument is generalizable and robust enough for high-level academic publication.

A comprehensive guide for political science scholars to pressure-test their research ideas against the standards of the American Political Science Review (APSR). This skill emphasizes demonstrating general disciplinary significance (matters to the field) over mere subfield novelty, guiding users through framing, contribution type, and appropriate track selection.