Skill UI

A comprehensive, single-cycle master calendar and workflow guide for major academic conferences like ICSE. It details the entire ten-month journey, covering mandatory milestones from abstract submission and full paper drafting to author response, revision sprints, and final camera-ready preparation. This guide helps research teams plan backward, mitigate timeline risks, and manage complex project dependencies.

This guide provides detailed structuring advice for writing empirical software engineering (SE) research papers for top-tier conferences like ICSE. It focuses on adopting the required academic rigor, including using Research Questions (RQs) as the core skeleton, mastering the 'Threats to Validity' section, and calibrating claims for verifiability. Learn how to structure the abstract, compress content into a 10-page limit, and address reviewer expectations in the SE community.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for authors submitting software artifacts to academic venues like ICSME. It details how to structure packages, track provenance, and document code to achieve the IEEE Open Research Object and Research Object Reviewed badges. Learn how to design for rigorous, reproducible evaluation by evaluators in a bounded time frame.

This comprehensive guide assists software engineers in determining the most appropriate venue (e.g., ICSME, ICSE, MSR) for their research paper. It clarifies the critical difference between general software engineering techniques and studies focused on the post-release lifecycle, such as maintenance, technical debt, program comprehension, and system evolution.

This guide provides stringent rules and structural advice for authors tackling academic papers, particularly in the domain of software maintenance and evolution. It emphasizes leading with the maintenance problem, stating research questions as contractual measurements, pairing every claim with proportional evidence, and rigorously discussing threats to validity. Use this when revising academic submissions to ensure maximum impact and technical rigor for the field.

A comprehensive tool designed to help authors assess the suitability and optimal framing of their manuscripts for the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE). It guides the structuring of contributions, required evidence (runnable artifacts, benchmarks), and positioning relative to core SE concepts like program analysis, testing, and AI-assisted development. Use this guide to strategize conference submissions and strengthen the academic narrative.

This skill guides authors on positioning manuscripts for the IEEE RO-MAN conference. It helps assess suitability, reframes content from general CS styles, and structures the narrative around core human-robot communication, social behavior, and interaction design. Use it for strategic venue selection and improving submission quality for human-robot interaction research.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine the suitability and strategic framing for submitting manuscripts to the IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER). It covers core scope alignment (reverse engineering, reengineering, code intelligence), required evidence standards (practical tools, benchmarks), and provides crucial guidelines for positioning the work relative to other top-tier CS venues.

This guide assists authors with positioning their computer science manuscripts for the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). It details the core scope, including software maintenance, evolution, refactoring, and technical debt, and provides best practices for structuring submissions. It emphasizes the need for real repository evidence, actionable engineering insights, and proper differentiation from related venues like SANER or ICSE.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). This skill helps assess if a computer science manuscript is a strong fit for the venue, focusing on requirements elicitation, modeling, traceability, and stakeholder-centered validation. It provides guidance on re-framing submissions and structuring evidence for academic conference acceptance.

This guide helps authors properly structure and position computer science manuscripts for submission to the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). It covers conference fit assessment, required evidence (system, user, perceptual validation), effective paper framing, and strategic advice on rebuttal and scope definition within the AR/MR domain, ensuring the work meets top-tier venue expectations.

This tool guides authors in assessing whether their communications or networking manuscript is a suitable fit for the IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC). It emphasizes the journal's call-driven, high-impact nature, checking if the contribution is a true frontier advance required by a specific, active topical call, rather than just a routine technical improvement. It covers scope alignment, technical rigor, and house style.