Skill UI

A structured guide for authors on how to frame the central findings of an Econometric Theory (ET) paper. It ensures that the contribution is clearly articulated by defining the underlying problem, stating the main theorem and its scope, identifying the generality delta, and discussing practical implications, meeting the rigorous standards of top academic journals.

This central routing skill guides authors through the complex process of journal selection for engineering and technology manuscripts. It does not replace a single journal submission but first classifies the content based on the engineering sub-discipline, contribution type (e.g., method, system, device), validation shape (e.g., simulation, field experiment), and intended audience breadth. It then routes the paper to the most specialized and appropriate journal skill for accurate re-framing and submission.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for preparing Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscripts. It guides users through the complex submission pipeline by determining the optimal article type (e.g., Research Article, Critical Review, Policy Analysis) and the current stage of writing, ensuring the content maintains clear environmental significance. It routes users to specific sub-skills like data analysis, literature positioning, and writing style.

This guide outlines best practices for structuring academic papers submitted via OpenReview, particularly for venues like ICLR. It advises authors on where to place different types of evidence—such as core claims, full derivations, code, and large datasets—to ensure the central argument remains visible while maintaining academic rigor. It covers strategies for managing annexes, maintaining anonymity, and updating revisions.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for writing and submitting manuscripts to the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It guides authors through the entire writing lifecycle, emphasizing the critical 'reframing test' to ensure the work addresses issues of broad, fundamental interest to the study of religion, rather than remaining confined to a narrow subfield. It provides a structured path from initial idea generation to final submission and revision.

This skill acts as a central router for manuscripts targeting The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE). It guides the user through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous identification, robustness testing, writing, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps diagnose the current bottleneck and suggests the next specialized skill to use, ensuring adherence to JLE's high standards for empirical economic analysis of law.

A comprehensive guide detailing the submission and review process for the M&SOM journal. Learn about the author-driven departmental routing, the double-anonymous review structure, key decision criteria (operations-centrality, originality), and how to correctly interpret various decision letters (Major/Minor/Desk Reject) to maximize publication chances.

This skill acts as a central router for manuscripts targeting The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It does not replace specialized skills but rather diagnoses the current stage of a clinical manuscript—from initial significance testing to response to reviewers—and directs the user to the correct subsequent skill (e.g., nejm-fit, nejm-study-design). It outlines the rigorous workflow, necessary checks, and structural differences required for submission to top-tier clinical journals.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for achieving full reproducibility in theoretical computer science papers (like those presented at POPL). It details how to ensure that independent readers can re-establish research claims by meticulously tracking mechanized theorems, on-paper proofs, formal semantics, and empirical results. Key practices include maintaining a central correspondence table and ensuring assumption hygiene to prevent logical divergence.

A comprehensive checklist detailing the final pre-submission steps for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) via SageTrack/ScholarOne Manuscript Central. It guides authors through masking, ASA style compliance, abstract formatting, and fee verification to ensure the manuscript meets all journal requirements and avoids temporary rejection.

This skill establishes the root directory for a collaborative workshop, serving as a centralized project hub. It manages two distinct paths: using an existing local directory (Path A), or initializing a new private GitHub repository (Path B). It scaffolds the necessary structure—including `desks/`, `bench/`, and `CAIRN.md`—while strictly preserving existing work and preventing repository nesting. Ideal for standardizing project setup and maintaining collaboration standards.

This skill implements a comprehensive logging guard to prevent Protected Health Information (PHI) leakage into logs, traces, and error reports. It acts as a pre-emission filter, redacting structured identifiers (SSN, email, phone) via regex and handling free-text PHI using advanced models. Essential for maintaining strict data privacy and compliance when shipping logs to centralized stores or error trackers.