Skill UI

Defines role-based allowed tools and skills for spawn_subagent workflows, including boundaries for executors, reviewers, planners, and testers. Useful for configuring sub-agents safely and consistently.

A comprehensive security auditing tool designed to analyze codebases for vulnerabilities. It provides a structured workflow to scan entire repositories, review specific changes (like PR diffs or single commits), and suggest verified patch files. Findings are challenged by independent agents, ensuring that suggested fixes are targeted and require manual review before application.

A comprehensive tool for managing high-performance GPU resources via Itô Compute. It allows users to query live GPU inventory, submit authenticated fixed-rate Requests for Quote (RFQ), inspect procurement status, and run explicit node qualification tests. This system is designed for finding capacity (e.g., H100/H200) and validating node readiness for compute workloads.

A comprehensive guide detailing the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAAG) review process. It covers double-anonymous peer review, subject editor criteria, common pitfalls (such as lack of theory or poor cartography), and how to interpret decision letters to maximize acceptance chances. Use this before submission to stress-test your manuscript and improve scholarly rigor.

A comprehensive guide for academic researchers aiming to submit papers to the top accounting journal, *Accounting Research*. This skill helps authors identify if their research focus aligns with core accounting mechanisms, such as disclosure quality, auditing standards, and regulatory changes, distinguishing it from general corporate finance or economics.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript review process. It details the stages, including fit framing, editorial screening, and double-anonymous peer review, helping authors understand how to structure their work to meet rigorous field-wide academic standards and maximize publication chances.

A comprehensive final preflight guide for submitting manuscripts to the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) via Editorial Manager. It covers strict requirements for double-blind review, including anonymization rules, word count limits, formatting (APSA/Chicago), Supporting Information caps, and human subjects documentation, ensuring the manuscript is ready before hitting submit.

This is the comprehensive orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, helping them determine the correct submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) and ensuring critical steps, such as mandatory third-party code verification, are integrated from the start. It dispatches to specific sub-skills rather than drafting content.

This guide outlines the strategic process for developing a scholarly review article after receiving an invitation. It details how to align the full review's scope with the editor, manage the co-development relationship, and anticipate the specific critical questions posed by Annals referees, ensuring the article maintains a strong framework and critical attitude.

A comprehensive guide for authors assessing the suitability of their clinical or translational oncology studies for Annals of Oncology (ESMO). It covers the journal's high standards for rigorous, practice-changing research, including requirements for robust trial design, biomarker validation, adherence to specific reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), and alignment with ESMO best practices. This is a venue-fit aid, not medical or regulatory advice.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to the Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) journal via Editorial Manager. It verifies all necessary components, including double-anonymization compliance, declarations (AI, ethics, interests), article types, and open-access decisions, ensuring readiness before the final submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting to ASE (Automated Software Engineering). It details mandatory requirements for ensuring research reproducibility, covering the Data Availability Statement, providing anonymized and runnable tools, pinning system provenance (commits, versions, SHAs), and managing cached LLM outputs. Essential for passing rigorous peer review.