Skill UI

Guides researchers through drafting publication-ready machine learning papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, and COLM by combining expert writing philosophy with LaTeX templates, citation verification APIs, and collaborative workflows.

This skill provides authors with a comprehensive guide to positioning their computer science manuscript for the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES). It covers critical aspects such as framing the contribution, meeting evidence standards, addressing social impacts, and distinguishing the work from similar venues like FAccT. Use it to refine submissions focused on AI ethics, governance, and socio-technical methods.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

A comprehensive guide for positioning AI/ML manuscripts for top-tier general AI conferences like AAAI. It helps authors refine their scope, frame their contribution, provide necessary evidence (e.g., ablations, baselines), and strategically compare their work against related research and similar venues (ICML, IJCAI). Ideal for pre-submission manuscript refinement.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP). It helps authors strategically frame, position, and strengthen the evidence of manuscripts focused on crowdsourcing, human-AI collaboration, and collective intelligence, ensuring the work meets the specific academic bar of the venue.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and documenting empirical evidence for high-level AI research submissions (e.g., AAAI). It covers essential methodologies including strong baselines, single-factor ablations, robustness testing (shift, seed, prompt), statistical significance, and ensuring perfect alignment with reproducibility checklists and ethical reporting. Use this guide before submission to ensure empirical evidence strongly supports all claimed AI contributions.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for writing the Related Work section for submissions to AAAI. It teaches authors how to robustly position their paper's novelty by distinguishing contributions from both established archival literature and contemporaneous non-archival work (like arXiv papers). It also addresses specific reviewer expectations across various AI subfields (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR) and outlines clear structural templates for maximum impact.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers strengthen the reproducibility of AI academic papers for top-tier conferences like AAAI. It outlines best practices for creating a claim-to-evidence ledger, documenting seeds, hyperparameters, compute costs, and dataset licensing. Use this to ensure your work meets the highest standards of academic rigor and verifiability.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-phase review structure of the AAAI conference. It advises authors on navigating the two-phase review process, mitigating Phase 1 rejection risks, structuring effective rebuttals, and understanding decision mapping across pre-submission, discussion, and final decision stages.

This guide helps researchers strategically decide if their AI project is a strong fit for the AAAI conference. It provides detailed criteria, including strong and weak signals, and routing logic to determine whether the work should be submitted to AAAI, or routed to specialized venues like NeurIPS, ICML, or domain-specific conferences (e.g., CVPR, KDD). Use it to refine your project's framing and maximize submission success.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management framework for submitting research to the AAAI conference. It maps out every critical milestone, from initial topic selection and abstract submission, through the two-phase peer review, writing the rebuttal, and preparing the final camera-ready version and public artifacts. It emphasizes backward planning from hard deadlines and maintaining evidence integrity throughout the rigorous academic lifecycle.

This guide helps authors audit the novelty and eligibility of multiagent system research for submission to AAMAS. It provides comprehensive advice on positioning the work against literature spanning multiple top-tier venues (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML, AAAI, EC, JAAMAS), integrating concepts from multiagent RL, game theory, and social choice. It ensures submissions are positioned accurately compared to the broader academic community, maximizing impact and minimizing rejection risk.