Skill UI

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting evidence packages (artifacts) for NLP research papers, such as code, datasets, prompts, and model outputs. It details requirements for reproducibility, adhering to the Responsible NLP checklist, ensuring proper anonymization, and preparing for post-acceptance public release in academic settings like ACL.

A comprehensive guide to modeling the entire academic review cycle for major NLP conferences like ACL. It details the stages from initial submission (ARR cycle intake) through peer review, author response, meta-review synthesis, commitment decision, and final venue decision (Main Conference, Findings, or Reject). It also outlines the roles of reviewers, area chairs, and program chairs, providing strategic advice for authors on navigating the complex publication landscape.

A comprehensive guide for NLP researchers on strategically positioning their work before writing. It teaches how to determine the core linguistic contribution, select the optimal academic venue (ACL, EMNLP, etc.), manage the scope (long vs. short papers), and align the research focus with specific conference themes and review expectations, maximizing publication impact.

This guide helps authors assess the suitability of their computer science manuscripts for the ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM). It provides detailed strategies for framing, highlighting multimodal contributions, structuring evidence, and aligning the work with top-tier academic conference expectations in multimedia retrieval, multimodal learning, and media applications.

A comprehensive guide for authors on best practices for packaging, documenting, and ensuring the reproducibility of LLM artifacts (weights, data, code, prompts, etc.). It addresses requirements for anonymous academic review and public post-acceptance release, focusing on reproducibility, licensing, and transparency.

A comprehensive guide detailing best practices for designing and auditing empirical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs). It addresses critical pitfalls such as data contamination, baseline unfairness, model version drift, and decoding parameter sensitivity, ensuring that published results are robust, reproducible, and scientifically sound for academic publication.

A comprehensive guide detailing the academic review pipeline for the COLM conference. It covers the entire journey from abstract submission to final decisions, emphasizing unique elements such as LLM use rules, reciprocal reviewing obligations, and strategic methods for maximizing impact during the rebuttal phase. Essential reading for authors planning submissions to specialized, young venues.

A comprehensive guide for ML research groups planning multi-venue conference submissions (e.g., COLM). It details the critical path of academic publishing, emphasizing backward induction from hard deadlines (abstract, paper, rebuttal, decision). The workflow covers compute budget allocation, co-author coordination, claim tracking, and managing the technical pipeline from initial topic selection to final presentation, ensuring reproducibility and timely execution in fast-paced AI research cycles.

This guide instructs authors on how to package theoretical proofs for submission to COLT (Conference on Learning Theory). Since COLT does not have a formal artifact track, it emphasizes treating the proof appendix as the primary 'artifact.' It details best practices for creating a verifiable proof ledger, rigorously tracking constants and external results, and managing supplementary code to ensure maximum academic credibility.

A detailed guide for authors submitting theoretical machine learning papers (like COLT) regarding the appropriate inclusion and design of numerical simulations. It emphasizes that numerics should only visualize proved bounds, phase transitions, or separations, maintaining the focus on theoretical proofs rather than empirical data. Provides rules for plotting, reporting variability, and maintaining academic honesty.

This guide details the rigorous, mathematically focused peer-review pipeline for top ML conferences like COLT (Conference on Learning Theory). It explains the double-anonymous review system, how reviewers assess correctness, significance, and novelty, and provides actionable advice on structuring rebuttals and interpreting final decisions for researchers aiming for top-tier academic publication.