Skill UI

This skill simulates a comprehensive international journal peer review process by dynamically configuring a 5-seat review panel. It includes a Journal-Fit Reviewer, three peer-review roles, and a Devil's Advocate to challenge core arguments. The system automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology, then generates five role-separated review reports followed by a structured Editorial Decision Letter and Revision Roadmap. It supports various modes including full review, re-review, quick assessment, and reviewer calibration, handling inputs in multiple languages.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers determine the optimal conference or journal venue (e.g., AAMAS, NeurIPS, ICML, EC) for multi-agent AI research. It emphasizes that the contribution must center on the interaction result—such as mechanism design, coordination, or negotiation—rather than simply applying a single-agent method in a multiagent testbed. This tool sharpens the research framing before writing begins.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit machine learning manuscripts to the Asian Conference on Machine Learning (ACML). This skill helps evaluate manuscript fit, re-frame research from journal or arXiv styles, understand required contribution types (e.g., algorithms, theorems, benchmarks), and align the paper's evidence bar with the expectations of a top-tier, regional AI/ML venue. Use it for venue selection and submission strategy development.

This guide helps researchers determine if their embodied AI or robotics project is best suited for the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL). It provides a rigorous two-axis test—assessing if learning is the core contribution and if embodiment is essential to the claim—to decide between submitting to CoRL, ICRA, IROS, NeurIPS, or other journals.

A comprehensive guide for computer vision researchers on strategically positioning their work. It helps assess whether the core contribution is related to visual data or visual computation, providing fit tests and a routing map to recommend the most appropriate top-tier conferences (CVPR, ICCV, NeurIPS) or journals based on the contribution type and technical maturity.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors submitting NLP and Computational Linguistics papers to EACL. It covers conference positioning, manuscript re-framing from journal or arXiv styles, and establishes rigorous evidence standards. It helps authors ensure their work aligns with the European ACL community focus, optimizing the paper's narrative structure for high acceptance rates.

This skill guides authors on strategically positioning their AI/ML manuscripts for the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). It provides deep insights into the conference's scope, required contribution framing (e.g., algorithm, system, theorem), evidence standards, and how to tailor the narrative for a general European AI readership. Use it when targeting ECAI or needing to refine a paper from a journal or arXiv style into a selective conference submission.

This guide assists researchers in determining the optimal venue for their theoretical machine learning contributions. It provides a framework for evaluating whether a result is best suited for COLT, or if it belongs in other top-tier conferences (e.g., NeurIPS, ICML) or journals (e.g., JMLR). It emphasizes differentiating between rigorous mathematical proofs (bounds, separations) and purely empirical findings.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding the best venue for their machine learning manuscript. It helps evaluate whether a paper is a strong fit for ICML, or if it should be rerouted to specialized tracks, other top-tier conferences (NeurIPS, ICLR), or academic journals based on its core contribution type (theory, method, application) and novelty.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing in computer vision, pattern recognition, or machine learning methods. This skill helps authors evaluate whether their manuscript meets the high methodological rigor, archival standards, and specific formatting requirements of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI). It covers scope fit, evidence bar, structure, and pre-submission checklists.

This skill helps authors determine if their manuscript fits the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). It provides guidance on conference positioning, evidence requirements, framing, and submission checks. It ensures linguistic grounding and NLP relevance are visible to reviewers. Use it for venue selection, re-framing papers from journal style, and diagnosing submission risks like desk rejection. Always verify official CFPs before submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors positioning robotics research papers for top-tier conferences like ISRR. It helps assess scope fit, define the required evidence bar, re-frame content from journal/arXiv styles, and strategically compare the manuscript against similar venues (e.g., CoRL, ICRA). Ideal for optimizing conference submission strategy in embodied intelligence and foundational robotics.