Skill UI

This skill automates the research refinement process by entering an autonomous, multi-round review loop. It leverages any OpenAI-compatible LLM to score, critique, and guide necessary fixes until the work meets a high, expert-defined standard. It manages state persistence across rounds, simulating the rigorous process of professional peer review.

This skill implements an autonomous, multi-round research review loop, simulating the rigorous peer-review process of top-tier conferences. It iteratively reviews, identifies weaknesses, suggests fixes, and re-reviews a research document using the MiniMax API. The system manages state persistence across multiple rounds, ensuring continuous improvement until a 'ready' assessment is achieved or the maximum round limit is reached. Ideal for academic writing, thesis refinement, or comprehensive project documentation.

Generates structured peer-review quality critiques of academic papers, covering summaries, methodology scrutiny, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and recommendations across domains whenever a user requests reviews, analyses, or summaries of research publications.

This skill transforms a course syllabus (PDF, DOCX, etc.) into a highly curated, supplementary academic reading list. It parses topics and learning outcomes, calibrates content difficulty based on the target audience (undergraduate, graduate, etc.), and searches academic databases (Consensus) for recent, peer-reviewed papers. The output is a professional .docx file containing summaries, links, and advanced discussion questions, making it invaluable for educators and students needing structured, up-to-date course resources.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management framework for submitting research to the AAAI conference. It maps out every critical milestone, from initial topic selection and abstract submission, through the two-phase peer review, writing the rebuttal, and preparing the final camera-ready version and public artifacts. It emphasizes backward planning from hard deadlines and maintaining evidence integrity throughout the rigorous academic lifecycle.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

A comprehensive guide to modeling the entire academic review cycle for major NLP conferences like ACL. It details the stages from initial submission (ARR cycle intake) through peer review, author response, meta-review synthesis, commitment decision, and final venue decision (Main Conference, Findings, or Reject). It also outlines the roles of reviewers, area chairs, and program chairs, providing strategic advice for authors on navigating the complex publication landscape.

This guide details the rigorous, mathematically focused peer-review pipeline for top ML conferences like COLT (Conference on Learning Theory). It explains the double-anonymous review system, how reviewers assess correctness, significance, and novelty, and provides actionable advice on structuring rebuttals and interpreting final decisions for researchers aiming for top-tier academic publication.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing high-stakes computer vision experiments for top-tier conferences. It covers critical areas like 'matched-substrate fairness,' 'six-month-staleness testing,' and rigorous ablation studies, ensuring that claims are robust, reproducible, and withstand intense peer review scrutiny.

This guide outlines the complete project management workflow for major computer vision conferences like ECCV, CVPR, and ICCV. It covers the entire academic cycle, from initial registration and submission through peer review, acceptance, camera-readiness, and post-conference retargeting strategies. Useful for research teams planning multiple submissions across even and odd years.

This skill simulates the rigorous peer review process used in top-tier AI and machine learning conferences (like NeurIPS). It helps users diagnose potential weaknesses in a submission regarding quality, clarity, significance, ethical compliance, and reproducibility. It guides the identification of decision-relevant issues that ACs and reviewers are likely to raise, helping authors strategically plan responses for revision.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to PR&AI, detailing how to truthfully declare and provide verifiable artifacts (code, data, models) for peer review. It emphasizes honesty, consistency, and structuring a reproducible repository to enhance reviewer trust.