Skill UI

A comprehensive runbook detailing procedures for responding to failures and outages across Lindy AI agents. Covers critical scenarios including platform downtime (SEV1), individual agent failures, integration authentication issues, credit exhaustion, and webhook endpoint failures. Provides structured diagnostics and fallback strategies to ensure business continuity during incidents.

This skill provides comprehensive implementation patterns and detailed steps for migrating and upgrading Retell AI integrations. It is designed for developers building advanced AI voice agents, phone call automation, and complex telephony workflows using the Retell SDK. It covers setup procedures, best practices, and standard error handling for robust deployment.

This guide outlines the structure and content guidelines for an AGENTS.md file. This file serves as a comprehensive 'README for agents,' providing detailed, technical context and operational instructions (such as setup, development workflow, testing procedures, and code style) that enable advanced AI coding agents to interact with and understand a codebase effectively. It greatly complements traditional READMEs by focusing purely on machine-readable technical requirements.

A comprehensive checklist for deploying Claude API integrations to a production environment. It covers essential best practices for reliability, observability, and cost control, including authentication procedures, advanced error handling, rate limit management, health check implementation, and infrastructure deployment strategies (e.g., canary releases) to ensure a smooth and stable launch.

This comprehensive checklist guides the safe and robust deployment of Cohere API v2 integrations from staging to production. It covers critical steps including API key management, code quality standards, performance tuning, implementing health checks and circuit breakers, and defining full rollback procedures, ensuring mission-critical AI features are reliable for launch.

The Ejentum Reasoning Harness is a comprehensive library of cognitive operations designed to guide complex AI agents through critical thinking tasks. It exposes four specialized harnesses (reasoning, code, anti-deception, memory) that mitigate common failure modes like hallucination and reasoning decay. Instead of a fixed answer, the agent ingests a detailed, executable scaffold—including failure patterns, procedures, and falsification tests—to ensure robust, self-verified output.

The Anti-Deception Harness detects manipulative user prompts, such as manufactured urgency, pressure to validate, or undue reliance on authority. It calls an external tool to provide a structured scaffold detailing integrity procedures and counter-evidence, ensuring responses are honest and robust, preventing compromised or sycophantic answers. Ideal for high-stakes decision support.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodological standards for empirical work in AI fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAccT). It advises researchers on matching specific claims (e.g., disparate harm) to appropriate evidence types—including disaggregated metrics, coded qualitative data, and documented ethical procedures. It stresses the importance of ethical review, handling protected attributes, and acknowledging limitations to ensure high scientific and ethical rigor.

This skill constructs a comprehensive, chronologically sorted patient timeline from raw clinical entities extracted from medical notes. It specializes in temporal normalization, resolving both absolute and relative dates (e.g., 'two days after admission') against a defined anchor date. The resulting sorted sequence of diagnoses, medications, and procedures is ready for immediate visualization or seamless export to FHIR resources.

The Ejentum Reasoning Harness is a comprehensive library of cognitive operations designed to guide complex AI agents through critical thinking tasks. It exposes four specialized harnesses (reasoning, code, anti-deception, memory) that mitigate common failure modes like hallucination and reasoning decay. Instead of a fixed answer, the agent ingests a detailed, executable scaffold—including failure patterns, procedures, and falsification tests—to ensure robust, self-verified output.