Skill UI

This skill is designed to manage complex, multi-step tasks by coordinating the efforts of multiple specialized AI agents. It provides structured methods for listing available agents, initiating real-time conversations, submitting complex background tasks (such as data analysis or report generation), tracking task status, and maintaining conversational context using session IDs. It is essential when a core task requires diverse expert knowledge or sequential collaboration.

A systematic auditor designed to evaluate the resilience and quality of complex AI workflows. It scans across five critical dimensions—Prompt Quality, Context Efficiency, Tool Health, Architecture Fitness, and Safety—providing a scored report and prioritized, actionable remediation steps. Use this tool to find hidden flaws and ensure robustness before deploying any AI agent or system.

This advanced workflow is designed to generate comprehensive, fact-checked research reports on any complex topic. It systematically performs fan-out web searches across multiple defined angles, fetches multiple sources, and employs a rigorous adversarial verification system (3-vote) to validate claims. The final output is a highly cited, synthesized report, ideal for academic or critical business research.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and documenting empirical evidence for high-level AI research submissions (e.g., AAAI). It covers essential methodologies including strong baselines, single-factor ablations, robustness testing (shift, seed, prompt), statistical significance, and ensuring perfect alignment with reproducibility checklists and ethical reporting. Use this guide before submission to ensure empirical evidence strongly supports all claimed AI contributions.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and reporting high-rigor multi-agent experiments, especially in game theory and self-play systems. It emphasizes testing the *interaction* claim—such as convergence to equilibrium, truthful behavior, or emergent cooperation—against held-out opponents, populations, and strategic deviations, moving beyond simple single-agent leaderboard scores.

This comprehensive guide provides stringent methodological standards for authors submitting papers to ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It details how to rigorously validate cross-modal claims, ensuring that evidence supports the multimedia contributions. Key areas covered include designing ablations to isolate fusion mechanisms, conducting robust user studies, reporting performance against matched baselines, and maintaining transparency regarding datasets, media licenses, and compute costs.

A detailed guide for authors submitting theoretical machine learning papers (like COLT) regarding the appropriate inclusion and design of numerical simulations. It emphasizes that numerics should only visualize proved bounds, phase transitions, or separations, maintaining the focus on theoretical proofs rather than empirical data. Provides rules for plotting, reporting variability, and maintaining academic honesty.

This comprehensive checklist is designed for auditing NLP research papers, particularly for major conferences like EACL. It serves as a claims audit, ensuring that every reported result, claim, or finding—including hyperparameters, compute costs, verbatim prompts, data sources, and significance testing—is fully documented and reproducible. It emphasizes academic rigor and transparency in AI research.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for designing and auditing empirical experiments for top-tier ML conferences. It covers necessary ablations, robustness checks (e.g., data shift, seeds), fair baselines, and detailed compute reporting to ensure that reported gains are scientifically genuine, reproducible, and address common reviewer skepticism.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for designing, auditing, and documenting AI experiments for major conferences like IJCAI. It covers establishing strong baselines, conducting ablation studies, and reporting meticulous details on hyperparameters, computational infrastructure, and ethical risks, ensuring maximum reproducibility and academic credibility for AI research.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing, evaluating, and reporting experimental results in speech processing research (ASR, TTS, Speaker Verification, etc.). It details required metrics (WER, MOS, EER), establishing robust baselines, conducting significance testing (bootstrap, CI), and ensuring comprehensive condition coverage (speakers, noise, languages) to enhance the scientific rigor of academic submissions.

This comprehensive guide instructs researchers on how to design rigorous and credible evaluations for Machine Learning systems. It covers critical areas such as workload selection, baseline comparison discipline, reporting four key coordinates (throughput, latency tails, memory, cost), structuring ablations, and generating scaling evidence. It ensures measurements meet academic benchmarking standards.