Skill UI

This advanced workflow extends beyond basic search capabilities. It allows users to discover pages semantically similar to a given URL, retrieve detailed content, highlights, and summaries from known URLs (batch processing), and generate comprehensive, cited answers using AI. Ideal for deep academic research, competitive intelligence, and content enrichment pipelines.

This advanced skill is a multi-agent research framework designed for executing deep, extensive research in parallel. It orchestrates a team of 10 specialized agents to gather, synthesize, and analyze information simultaneously. It is ideal for complex topics that require rapid, broad, and battle-tested investigation across multiple dimensions, significantly accelerating the knowledge discovery process.

This comprehensive workflow guides users through the end-to-end process of utilizing cloud-based GPU computing resources on Vast.ai. It covers searching for ideal GPU offers based on specs and price, provisioning an instance, running complex training or inference jobs via SSH, collecting model artifacts, and crucially, destroying the instance to prevent unexpected billing. Ideal for deep learning training and research.

This skill orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a sophisticated two-loop architecture. It manages the entire research lifecycle, from initial literature review and hypothesis formation to running constrained experiments and synthesizing findings into publishable papers. It acts as a project manager, autonomously driving the process while structuring the workspace and presenting progress to human users.

This skill automates the research refinement process by entering an autonomous, multi-round review loop. It leverages any OpenAI-compatible LLM to score, critique, and guide necessary fixes until the work meets a high, expert-defined standard. It manages state persistence across rounds, simulating the rigorous process of professional peer review.

This skill implements an autonomous, multi-round research review loop, simulating the rigorous peer-review process of top-tier conferences. It iteratively reviews, identifies weaknesses, suggests fixes, and re-reviews a research document using the MiniMax API. The system manages state persistence across multiple rounds, ensuring continuous improvement until a 'ready' assessment is achieved or the maximum round limit is reached. Ideal for academic writing, thesis refinement, or comprehensive project documentation.

This skill generates a comprehensive issue report on the current challenges, limitations, and open problems within Japanese Natural Language Processing (NLP) for a specified topic. By combining knowledge from a curated local dataset with real-time web search, it provides a deep dive into ongoing research gaps, evaluating the state-of-the-art and recommending areas for future work.

A mechanism for spawning hierarchical, nested sub-agents up to five levels deep, designed specifically for deep task delegation while managing context limitations. Instead of parallel execution, this ensures that each layer of decomposition receives a fresh context window, preventing the parent agent's context budget from being overwhelmed by complex, multi-step workflows. Ideal for research, verification, and synthesis processes.

Manages the creation and orchestration of complex, multi-step workflows. Supports two powerful methods: persistent MCP templates for human-gated, resumable pipelines, or native JavaScript scripts for advanced, programmatic agent fan-out. Ideal for complex business logic such as auditing, research, or multi-stage data processing.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

This guide details the rigorous, mathematically focused peer-review pipeline for top ML conferences like COLT (Conference on Learning Theory). It explains the double-anonymous review system, how reviewers assess correctness, significance, and novelty, and provides actionable advice on structuring rebuttals and interpreting final decisions for researchers aiming for top-tier academic publication.